beaeglebeachedd

5 ms·

1.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
Not in practice in most the places it happens. Much of forested Guyana and Brazil is wide open to ANYONE, no law enforcement and no immigration enforcement.
2.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
It reduces the amount of time you are in the residential area meaning there is less opportunity to even contact a pedestrian or cyclist. At the extreme in some areas if you could go the speed of light you could essentially pick a time when
3.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
Weed is illegal everywhere in the US by federal law and defacto illegal by state law in most 'legal' states if you are anything other than a homeless bum, as driving a car with metabolites or owning a gun (or just living in same h
4.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
Gun control has gotten looser on state level. Federal seems to get worse every couple decades. It started with the NFA, then the GCA, then the hughes amendment. Finally everything became a felony so they just disarmed undesirable people
5.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
Except for the things that most affect common Americans. Like how most housing has onerous zoning and code requirements, banking has kyc/AML and reporting, OSHA controls our work conditions, kids families can be investigated for pract
6.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
Strike that, legal stop
7.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
Ours removed them after the guys who made and installed the cameras were caught ducking the process servers from triggering their own cameras and all involved were found to be hypocrites.
8.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
Might work where you live. A huge portion of my city has foreign plates or straight up illegals driving, they don't give a fuck about a camera and can, will, and have totaled my car for playing the safe stop fuck fuck game. Nope nope
9.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
I passed through a town in Ohio and was cited to pay or appear to a mayors court. I looked it up and it was literally the mayor's court, and he was required to have something like one day of training. Immediately decided they'd p
10.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
Basically all money in circulation is prior proceeds of crime (and also will soon be going back to crime) and all reasonable lukewarm IQ people know this. It's such a chicken shit law.
11.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
Ideally it will lead to a military dictatorship where the population of each country is 1. Whether that becomes reality...
12.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
Which is what the articles of confederation were moving closer towards, decentralized affiliated states. It was a move closer towards anarchism but ironically many anarchists would have a meltdown if we suggested going from what we've
13.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
That's one interpretation. Another us the idea that only voluntary interactions and transactions are legitimate -- i.e. taxation or forceful socialist takeover of capital is archist. The common thread is the idea of decentralized, idea
14.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
The genders are not equal, you're operating on fictional premise.
15.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
This is sortition. I would apply it liberally and use it for most legislative offices. Elections and appointments tend to bring out the worst of society -- the kind who actually want power over peoples' lives.
16.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
The 14th amendment is a restriction on government. Civil rights acts on private entities involved in intrastate trade. CRA also expressly allows racism unlike the 14th. For instance the civil rights act allows a business to preferentially
17.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
The military was happy to systematically seize guns from citizens in NOLA during Katrina. They will follow unlawful orders to keep their dental plans active.
18.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
There's no federal dictate on how electoral college votes IIRC. Sometimes they go rogue,though it may violate state law.
19.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
The 10th amendment was supposed to restrain the federal government to a few enumerated powers. It was gutted via interstate commerce being everything, and you can't give it up because people will start screaming about the civil rights
20.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
The constitution arguably wasn't designed for a government that did much of what it's doing. Shouldn't be hard to pass an amendment to legalize it if it's that necessary right? We needed an amendment just to federally
21.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
Excellent. Deregulate then. That's the desired effect of this anyway.
22.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
It's a valid point. Another valid point is at that time it was known the FDA had a history of approving addictive drugs. It is not evidence based to trust FDA over hundreds of years of history countering otherwise. I knew LOTS of pe
23.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
Chinese emporers were controlling opiates all the way back in the 1700s and the British were tied up in war for 20 years over the wreckage to the Chinese addicts. The doctors, all college educated, some of our most studied and intelligent c
24.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
Didn't we also invade the religious nutsos stopping Afghanistan from producing poppies and then prop up a fake regime that let it flourish, massively increasing the supply of natural opiates? If I recall, the timing works out pretty g
25.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
I've worked in the ER, held a license to work there, and spend everyday with licensed providers in addiction medicine. I assure you I have more familiarity here than even most addicts. But you win the victim totempole height contest I
26.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
Of course, I speak from the pillar of privilege and but am a lowly untouchable on the great victimhood totempole. We should instead only listen to the high priest victims, uncontrollably fented our their minds to kill the pain. If you want
27.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
On the plus side between oxy and COVID distrust is now at all time highs. People have learned you can't trust the doc anymore than a quik-lube mecanico.
28.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
You didn't learn about the opium wars? I'm not talking about dare which was obvious bullshit, I'm talking of learning from history. There was no weed war, that a drug caused a couple wars lasting decades should at least rai
29.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
It's the same shit practically all the way back to opium wars. Always the drug dealers fault. I blame the patient. We've known opiates were bad since at least the 1800s, and really longer than that. What the doc said was just wh
30.
by beaeglebeachedd 2y ago
I don't sympathize with the violence, I sympathize with a brother being pushed into turning a family member over to be placed into supermax isolation which arguably violated the 8th amendment . I might be able to stomach handing a brot

More ›