bdg

5 ms·

1.
Agent Index Documenting Technical and Safety Features(arxiv.org)
1 points by bdg 5mo ago|1 comments
2.
Generative artificial intelligence for computational chemistry(arxiv.org)
3 points by bdg 5mo ago|0 comments
3.
What a 1GW Orbital GPU Farm Looks Like(orbital-dc.research.statagroup.com)
4 points by bdg 7mo ago|0 comments
4.
by bdg 9mo ago
I wonder if going the other way, maxing out semantic density per token, would improve LLM ability (perhaps even cost). We use naturally evolved human languages for most of the training, and programming follows that logic to some degree, but
5.
Why Good Ideas Go Nowhere(kb.buildingbetterteams.de)
2 points by bdg 1y ago|0 comments
6.
by bdg 2y ago
Leading is an imperfect predictor for the change we actually care about. Lagging is a late confirmer. Hours worked is an imperfect predictor of output in a factory. Widgets delivered is a late confirmer. Leading and lagging indicators for p
7.
A Digital Clock in Conway's Game of Life in CSS(odddirector.github.io)
1 points by bdg 3y ago|0 comments
8.
by bdg 3y ago
This requires a preset architecture standard that explains specifically what boxes and arrows are, and how boxes/arrows interact. Lots of software smears a logical box out over several folders in the code, sometimes even with entirely
9.
by bdg 3y ago
Honestly we have the same problem outside of engineering. C4 is really just a way to focus conversations along one level of abstraction. How many times have you talked to someone who bounces up and down from high detail high complexity to z
10.
by bdg 3y ago
Having structured architecture conventions becomes more important when you have many architecture conversations across multiple people and would like to gain insights from the diagrams too.
11.
by bdg 3y ago
The code-model gap is why we don't have this. You don't organize code the way you mentally model it in many projects, and nearly all languages lack a way to solve this. Annotating code is prone to the same issue as keeping a diagr
12.
by bdg 3y ago
There is a medium-to-weak argument that enforcing these minimum standards even in clearly benign places raises standards everywhere, which means it is much less likely to show up in the really bad places. I'm just making debate however
13.
by bdg 3y ago
When I meet someone with two PhDs in Europe I started to evaluate if they're contributing massive brain-blasts to civilization or if they just wanted to delay the next chapter of adulthood and use free education as a camouflage.
14.
by bdg 3y ago
I have to say I feel like there's a lot of comments in this thread that are just totally detached from reality. I moved from Toronto to Berlin in 2017 and a lot of comments in here about living in fear of Muslims is just ... I don&#x27
15.
by bdg 3y ago
These DSL tools can be absolutely fantastic and feel powerful in the hands of one person, but the issues come when multiple people get involved. I train teams to use C4 diagrams, one of the most common issues they tell me they had in the pa
16.
by bdg 3y ago
Our languages mostly do not have the syntax needed to express higher abstractions. You could create one via meta files or special comment notation perhaps, but it doesn't exist yet (outside of class diagram generators). A big part of t
17.
by bdg 3y ago
https://leftwardsplanning.com/ I'm building a planning methodology for tech teams to use once they know what they want to build in an iteration. This is meant to be the missing near-term tactical planning framework, no
18.
by bdg 3y ago
The thing with stupid people is they think everyone else is stupid except themselves.
19.
by bdg 3y ago
How do they solve the Code-Model gap?
20.
by bdg 3y ago
Is it just programmers, or is it product managers and literally everyone who wants that next feature?
21.
by bdg 3y ago
No, it groups together teams. Teams do not group teams.
22.
by bdg 3y ago
Yep. Had multiple ex-Faang folks who couldn't ship the most basic tickets in a startup because there weren't 10 invisible teams making their lives easier.
23.
by bdg 3y ago
In the article he identified the authors are moving the platform concept to a "grouping" instead of a team. This is a very recent development that mostly only people who are active in the community know about.
24.
by bdg 3y ago
https://buildingbetterteams.de/profiles/brian-graham I write about a lot of stuff, ranging from technical topics like page performance or git commands, up to how I run my business, or management topics like "How t
25.
by bdg 3y ago
Hey just to be clear, I picked the 25k setup but this is not included in the cost because it is required startup capital, not expenses. So it does still require 25k. Actually there's a way to do it with 12500€ but that's with more
26.
Theory X and Theory Y management(en.wikipedia.org)
77 points by bdg 3y ago|36 comments
27.
So you want to start a SaaS business in Germany(buildingbetterteams.de)
6 points by bdg 3y ago|2 comments
28.
by bdg 3y ago
Very cool game mechanics. You could probably make some good money if you get this into an app store.
29.
by bdg 3y ago
Looks like a ransom note.
30.
by bdg 3y ago
Is this like a phar file?

More ›