bauldursdev

5 ms·

1.
by bauldursdev 1mo ago
If you don't verify identity it's easy to fake.
2.
by bauldursdev 1mo ago
Sounds really cool, were you able to verify the correctness of the results?
3.
by bauldursdev 2mo ago
Why wouldn't inference get less expensive? The frontier will probably always be expensive but imagine if in 5-10 years Fable 5 is considered a low tier antiquated model, it is still somewhat capable.
4.
by bauldursdev 2mo ago
They do, but unethical people don't announce themselves. In fact an ethical person is probably more likely to admit their faults, which usually doesn't play well in elections.
5.
by bauldursdev 3mo ago
From a software POV, I feel like it makes it easier to implement stuff. Whether that stuff is good or bad. If you know what you're doing, vet the output, and use it properly, you can get a nice productivity boost while still producing
6.
by bauldursdev 3mo ago
Is there anything that would point to this possibly being the case?
7.
by bauldursdev 3mo ago
For it to fix the bug it has to identify the bug. If the bug is a security vulnerability then it will have to identify the security vulnerability to fix it. What's the alternative, have it ignore vulnerabilities/bugs? It wouldn&#x
8.
by bauldursdev 3mo ago
Unless by next door you mean a different continent I think they'd still be in Europe. Although there are edge cases, such as if the fab is turkey but the office managing it is in a neighboring central Asian country.
9.
by bauldursdev 3mo ago
I think they said increasing false positives because it would make it easier to generate at a mass scale. IDK the merits of the argument or what exactly they're saying would be done, but imagine pre-AI it might take someone quite a bit
10.
by bauldursdev 3mo ago
Can't solve a problem that doesn't exist yet
11.
by bauldursdev 3mo ago
To me it seems like it's more likely to refuse the harder the problem is. I wonder if it's cover for a model that's not as good as advertised. Even when I ask questions in biology it is switching me.
12.
by bauldursdev 3mo ago
No I'm paid to write code.
13.
by bauldursdev 3mo ago
There's such a spectrum between "give it everything" and "give it nothing". Imagine you just want to use it to code and want to make sure any commands it runs doesn't mess up your actual machine.
14.
by bauldursdev 3mo ago
Ya if you just run VMs but now a lot of cloud vendors have you build stuff using their proprietary features so decoupling becomes harder and can be risky.
15.
by bauldursdev 3mo ago
No, it's like, if you could buy 100 things before, but you can only buy 96 things now, then you have accumulated less value :D
16.
by bauldursdev 3mo ago
A human just predicts the next best action.
17.
by bauldursdev 4mo ago
I don't know how it is in Europe but when I worked at restaurants, it was just part of the managers job to bring the cash to the bank. It took 20-30 minutes, we'll say 1 hour if it's busy. The bank didn't charge a fee to
18.
by bauldursdev 4mo ago
Because information asymmetry benefits those with the information. If the devil understands your argument, and you don't understand the devil's argument, the devil will have information advantage.
19.
by bauldursdev 4mo ago
It's not just mind either. I know at least one person whose around 60, still very smart actually, but has diminished vision and hearing. So less able to pick up the obvious signs.
20.
by bauldursdev 4mo ago
I think they mean limited like it might be limited in performance or some other characteristics. :D
21.
by bauldursdev 4mo ago
I haven't read the paper but it seems like it's saying rude prompts are better, so isn't it reasonable to assume that's what they meant? If we want to talk about directness, that's kind of a tangent right? I see dir
22.
by bauldursdev 4mo ago
Ya my experience is that many people honestly don't produce output as good as AI. An educated (formally or informally), experienced person who is putting forward good effort is better than AI, but I do know people who honestly just pro
23.
by bauldursdev 4mo ago
Yeah it's the same thing. No shortage of uninformed opinions on each side (not like I know WTF is going to happen, but at least I don't go around presenting my uninformed beliefs as fact).
24.
by bauldursdev 4mo ago
No point? There certainly is a point. The point is that I don't sound like AI now. Sure, one day, some AI lab might build models so that everyone has a model that's indistinguishable from them, and at that point, this method won&#
25.
by bauldursdev 4mo ago
Maybe worth looking into other providers. I've never had issues disputing charges. Granted I dispute maybe 1% of the transactions I make, because I only do it if I legit got scammed. I think paying for a month and not getting a month i
26.
by bauldursdev 4mo ago
I know, I could've worded my comment clearer. I meant that I specifically introduce them in a way to make it obvious my text was written by me.
27.
by bauldursdev 4mo ago
I despise when someone just passes my prompt to an AI, but I do honestly think that there are a minority of people who do better work with it. Not that the work is good, but they don't care to try and at least the AI is eager.
28.
by bauldursdev 4mo ago
Agree wholeheartedly. I have actually started introducing small idiosyncrasies into my text to make it clear that my words come from me and not a bot.
29.
by bauldursdev 4mo ago
This is much much more complex than a traditional program, which can be followed line by line. Trying to understand every bit of the literal logic is like trying to understand a person by thinking about the neurons fired in their brain to m
30.
by bauldursdev 4mo ago
Yea, isn't a lot of software already developed like this? I doubt the lead developers of Chrome know the implementation details of every component of chrome. They know the high level architecture and leave a lot of the specific impleme

More ›