Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bauerd
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
1.
▲
by
bauerd
17d ago
They're the exception, not the rule. They get crawled like any other site, but happen to host git repositories. It's not obvious that these are targeted crawls and they likely may just end up in crawling queues a lot generally
2.
▲
by
bauerd
24d ago
By quantifying the result.
3.
▲
by
bauerd
2mo ago
I returned to hand-written notebooks. None of these knowledge management frameworks ever worked for me. Sure my agents have their own semantic memory system but I’m not an agent.
4.
▲
by
bauerd
2mo ago
Because these productivity increases will be to the detriment of the average person. We won’t get to reap the benefits.
5.
▲
by
bauerd
4mo ago
You don’t think there are causes worth fighting for? Or that deterrence is immoral? Help me understand.
6.
▲
by
bauerd
4mo ago
>I don’t know how I could work in any of these military industry companies. You'd sing a different song quite quickly once the threat stops being abstract as you don't get to free-ride on the security a defense industry provide
7.
▲
by
bauerd
4mo ago
It's part of a constantly evolving ecosystem. It's a stable product because reliability engineers make it so and software engineers get the integrations right.
8.
▲
by
bauerd
4mo ago
>What on earth do you do with that many devs on a project like Messenger? I mean, really? What makes you think it's a simple system to develop at scale?
9.
▲
by
bauerd
5mo ago
>Having said that, some components need to live outside the sandbox (otherwise, who creates the sandbox?). I run a single-node k3d cluster on each of my MacBooks which uses Agent Sandbox[0] to keep harnesses isolated. Harnesses access mo
10.
▲
by
bauerd
5mo ago
Fully agree, I only pay the minimum for frontier models to get DeepSeek v4 output reviewed. I don't see this changing either because we have reached a level of good enough at this point.
11.
▲
by
bauerd
5mo ago
They can't afford to care about individual customers because enterprise demand exploded and they're short on compute
12.
▲
by
bauerd
5mo ago
>On March 4, we changed Claude Code's default reasoning effort from high to medium to reduce the very long latency—enough to make the UI appear frozen—some users were seeing in high mode Instead of fixing the UI they lowered the def
13.
▲
by
bauerd
5mo ago
Health insurance and opportunity cost
14.
▲
by
bauerd
5mo ago
It would be interesting if they’re dogfooding it by building these research projects on those building blocks
15.
▲
by
bauerd
5mo ago
They are building infrastructure components that they will soon wire together with an orchestration layer. Managed agents, scheduled tasks, workflow webhook automation.
16.
▲
by
bauerd
5mo ago
This is a really verbose way to say that using generative AI has a detrimental effect on the user because one deprives themselves of the learning experience.
17.
▲
by
bauerd
5mo ago
No because the technology will be used against you.
18.
▲
by
bauerd
5mo ago
The argument isn't that LLMs are bad because they can hallucinate. Author (clearly) argues that LLM use has negative cognitive effects on their users and on society as a whole. Plus, the technology would wipe out a large, large number
19.
▲
by
bauerd
5mo ago
>They still have a long way to go before they can master a domain from first principles, which constrains the mastery possible. Mastery isn't necessary. Why are Waymos lacking drivers? Not because self-driving cars have mastered dri
20.
▲
by
bauerd
5mo ago
Not sure what you're insinuating. What do you think is the statistically average job on this planet? It's still going to be cultivating a smallholder farm in developing countries, or working in logistics, manufacturing or the broa
21.
▲
by
bauerd
5mo ago
The vast majority of people on this planet work repetitive, uncreative jobs.
22.
▲
by
bauerd
6mo ago
>a lack of imagination on what could be better I'd argue it's likelier that people are more informed about their absolute position globally. Any screen gets you the mental image of the top of the ladder. So happy people would e
23.
▲
by
bauerd
6mo ago
>Testing workloads that take hours to run still take hours to run with either a human or LLM testing them out (aka that is still the bottleneck) Absolutely. Tight feedback loops are essential to coding agents and you can’t run pipelines
24.
▲
by
bauerd
8mo ago
brew install emacs
25.
▲
by
bauerd
8mo ago
Generally wrong. It may cost less because its externalities aren't priced in.
26.
▲
by
bauerd
8mo ago
The company's values may align to yours, even though they reject you. It's because the interview process doesn't need to have anything to do with their real-world process. Their engineers probe you for the same "best pra
27.
▲
by
bauerd
8mo ago
In interviews just give them what they are looking for. Don't overthink it. Interviews have gotten so stupidly standardized as the industry at large copied the same Big Tech DSA/System Design/Behavioral process. And therefore
28.
▲
by
bauerd
8mo ago
It’s not how you get promoted though. Plus implementing complex UIs is challenging which engineers like. The incentives are off.
29.
▲
by
bauerd
1y ago
The sum absolutely does matter. All you’re saying is the fines are too low
30.
▲
by
bauerd
1y ago
Last thing I need is Kubernetes at home
More ›