Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
barisozmen
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
barisozmen
3mo ago
I also have a couple of tangential ideas for weighting endorsements: - Expertise match: e.g. Elon Musk endorsing a rocket engines book vs history book - Strength of endorsement: e.g. "This is the best book I've ever read," vs
2.
▲
by
barisozmen
3mo ago
Totally makes sense. There could be a scoring system where each endorsement is weighted by a "quote-whoreness" score or something like that.
3.
▲
Picking the best books among many good ones
(booksfromgreats.com)
4 points
by
barisozmen
3mo ago
|
4 comments
4.
▲
Show HN: DAG-based Kanji learning through components
(mykanji.app)
5 points
by
barisozmen
4mo ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
by
barisozmen
11mo ago
Even if the term 'variable' has roots in math where it is acceptable that it might not mutate, I think for clarity, the naming should be different. It's uneasy to think about something that can vary but not mutate. More clear
6.
▲
by
barisozmen
11mo ago
Hey OP, please continue this series! I'm in the same ship with you. I've been a Python developer for years, but recently start learning Ruby after I discovered its elegance. Your post here well resonates with me: https:/
7.
▲
by
barisozmen
1y ago
Yes, it's by homomorphic encryption as @vintermann mentioned. That being said, scientists can implement their own protocols, and use whatever technique they want. For example: https://github.com/securegenomics/prot
8.
▲
by
barisozmen
1y ago
You can do that by encrypting the names. You send encrypted names to the FHE-server, and then the server does necessary sorting computations on it. The point of FHE is it can operate on gibberish-looking ciphertext, and when this ciphertext
9.
▲
by
barisozmen
1y ago
You can reduce anything happening on the computer to arithmetic operations. If you can do additions and multiplications, then it's turing complete. All others can be constructed from them.
10.
▲
by
barisozmen
1y ago
An FHE Google today would be incredible expensive and incredibly slow. No one would pay for it. The key question I think is how much computing speed will improve in the future. If we assume FHE will take 1000x more time, but hardware also b
11.
▲
Fully homomorphic encryption and the dawn of a private internet
(bozmen.io)
449 points
by
barisozmen
1y ago
|
198 comments
12.
▲
by
barisozmen
1y ago
Answer to his though experiment: Yes, I believe a sufficiently advanced AI could told us that. Scientists who have been fed with wrong information can come up with completely new ideas. Making what we know less wrong. That being said, I do
13.
▲
by
barisozmen
1y ago
Exactly. That's another point
14.
▲
by
barisozmen
1y ago
"One technique for making software more robust is to minimize what your software depends on – the less that can go wrong, the less that will go wrong. Minimizing dependencies is more nuanced than just not depending on System X or Syste
15.
▲
by
barisozmen
1y ago
Completely agree. It's one of the most important skills to know which dependency is good and which is bad. My two cents. If a dependency is paid, than it is usually bad. Because the company providing that dependency has an incentive to
16.
▲
by
barisozmen
1y ago
I started doing a relevant project https://github.com/barisozmen/securegenomics . Because I believe 23andMe event will result in people to be more wary of sharing their genetic data, and we need ways to make people abl
17.
▲
by
barisozmen
1y ago
It was a great read! Just curious, how stable has your BGP setup been since deployment? Did you need to do a lot of maintenance, or was it like fire and forget?