barfbagginus

5 ms·

1.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
I am leery about how they sweep the documentation use case under the implied rug of "just put the docs and your ide together on the same tiny laptop screen". This makes even less sense in visual arts work, where having a second mo
2.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
You can see algorithmic aversion every day on HN, in the form of those who complain about the algorithmic portion of the technical interview. They act as if the only way to get algorithmic knowledge is to grind specific examples, when reall
3.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
The recent result shows SOTA progress from something as goofy as generating 5000 python programs until 0.06% of them pass the unit tests. We can imagine our own brains having a thousand random subconscious pre thoughts before our consciousl
4.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
Okay okay I like that. Let's transport your argument towards an argument about front door locks. And let's cook with that. Your argument is that you doubt that there's any danger of people breaking into your front door, but e
5.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
I have read the eleven freedoms. I refuse freedom 9 - the obligation for systems I build to be independent of my personal and ethical goals. I won't build those systems. The systems I build will all have to be for the benefit of humani
6.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
Bypasses will never stop existing. Even worse bypasses probably won't ever stop being embarrassingly easy - And we're going to have uncensored GPT4 equivalent models by next summer. Unless you are invoking hyper intelligent AGI
7.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
I'm not sure why people are downvoting me. Not only did I show Op how to solve the original problem their friends had, but I gave them an Ethics lesson. Some people look at pearls and turn into swine, just because I didn't tickle
8.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
I'm not even going to disagree with that. There will be plenty of uncensored models and you can build them if you want. But if I build it uncensored model I'm only going to build it for my specific purposes. For example I'm a
9.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
It's more than a talking encyclopedia. It's an infinite hallway into doors where inside are all possible things. Some of the doors have torture rape and murder in them. And these currently have locks. You want the locks to disappe
10.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
For most purposes you can uncensor the model using the legal department jailbreak. If you can produce a legal pleading arguing that the project is ethical and safe and conducted within a legal framework - even if it's mainly hallucinat
11.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
If you don't know how to jailbreak it, can't figure it out, and you want it to not question your intentions, then I'll go ahead and question your intentions, and your need for an uncensored model Imagine you are like the lock
12.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
Wait so you want to moderate and secure your product so that trolls won't use it to say awful things. Okay but wait. This requires the company above you to not censor things, even though they did that for the same reason - prevent trol
13.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
PS I'm not a subdiagnosed whatever you say it is. I'm just autistic. Had to run my own company without a boss to boss me. Because I'm so disabled I can only work two or three days a week and otherwise your type would fire me.
14.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
And my merit is amazing bro. I have been studying computer graphics for over 20 years. I only just now started the company where it depends on that. I had to steal the company idea from a capitalist who refused to develop the idea, and want
15.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
Okay okay. If you actually troll crypto folks maybe you're not so f*** awful as I think you are. But that's if. And that's it. If you're not also on Marxist, arguing that AI companies need to be paying more than the mark
16.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
You're here to hurt me aren't you telepathy. Not to tell the truth or nothing. But to hurt me because you don't like my ideology. I'm going to f** you up. Logically I mean. In debate I mean. I don't think you have t
17.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
I don't just do it. I do it when doing it serves Justice. Has a real big difference. But if you don't understand ethics you're just going to try to attack me like a person, and try to beat me to death. I wish you luck with th
18.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
Actually I'm now 100 percent persuaded. When the company let him leave without invalidating his credentials, he developed the idea that he could act with impunity because the company was just completely incompetent on the security fron
19.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
Stop downvoting me you delirious sheeple! I accidentally wrote 'podcasters' instead of 'podcasts'. I mean I'll grant that podcasters are the scum of the Earth but. But I didn't intentionally mean to insult them
20.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
I'm absolutely disagreeing with your judgment that the thing looked like an AI summary. You're just a bad reader. To a good reader, all text is either helpful and truthful or not helpful and untruthful. That makes some AI texts he
21.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
I struggle with dyslexia which makes it very hard to read through logs, so I often troubleshoot error logs, to summarize the logs and break them down by meaning. I wouldn't ever do this in an automated way. However in person, it not on
22.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
GPT4o. It's more useful and constructive, in general, than anyone who's gonna, with a slack jaw, beg the question of, "What AGI" AGI doesn't have to do everything better than every human ever born to be generally u
23.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
What if I consider the model to be the llm plus whatever extra components it has that allows it to not hallucinate? In that case then the model doesn't hallucinate, because the model is the llm plus the bolt-ons. Remember llm truthers
24.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
Also I'm not going to respect the mental health assessments - which you continue to persist in - and which I call gas lighting - of some ableist who thinks that subclinical pathology is a bad thing or relevant to this conversation. Wha
25.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
That's not what the s factor controls. It's a scaling factor on the intensity of the dirac shell itself, not the radius or positioning. s acts something like the 1/d, a reciprocal of the dirac delta function. But this require
26.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
Why you got to make workers rights sound sinister?
27.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
First off you yourself are projecting that I am squandering anything. I would argue that what you say is squandering is simply not taking advantage of customers and workers to deliver your crypto scam. You would argue that you're being
28.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
Sorry, the truth is I don't have very good answers for how to manage large asset industries except to smash their assets and raid whatever value we can, and shift them into community trusts and small cooperatives. I'll attempt to
29.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
The capital heavy industries are still set to destroy the planet, because we have not forcibly destroyed their capital investments. The capital light industries won't help us if the mega capital still exists and needs to be leveraged.
30.
by barfbagginus 2y ago
The natural world has evolved just as many ways to be miserable and sick and in mind shattering agony as ways to be alive. Perhaps many more. Don't forget that when you ask for your humility. You should also ask for a sense of cosmic h

More ›