bangaladore

7 ms·

1.
by bangaladore 5mo ago
Yup, I read "— think Cargo, but for C/C++." and closed the tab.
2.
by bangaladore 6mo ago
> Microsofts esteemed moat (office) is “Web only” on the lowest tier. If you've ever used it before, you'd quickly come to the conclusion that web only Office is only useful for someone writing essays for school. The moment you
3.
by bangaladore 6mo ago
The bigger problem here is it seems like the rust utilities were rushed to be released without extensive testing or security analysis because simply because they are written in rust . And this isn't the first serious flaw because of t
4.
by bangaladore 7mo ago
There is a license blurb in the readme. > This code, apart from the source in core/third-party, is licensed under the MIT License, see LICENSE in this repository. > The English-language models are also released under the MIT Lice
5.
by bangaladore 7mo ago
What's the point of posting what is clearly an AI generated comment.
6.
by bangaladore 7mo ago
Afaik Anthropic is not giving pretty much any provider model weights, so any inference of Opus is certainly not private. Either going through Anthropic or Bedrock, or Vertex. Of the three Bedrock is probably the best for trust, but still no
7.
by bangaladore 8mo ago
Another common tell nowadays is the apostrophe type (’ vs '). I don't know personally how to even type ’ on my keyboard. According to find in chrome, they are both considered the same character, which is interesting. I suspect som
8.
by bangaladore 8mo ago
> That's the beauty of constraint-based parametric modeling as opposed to, say, modeling in Blender. I was thinking the same thing. This looks more like an API that makes 3d modeling look closer to CAD, but without realizing that CA
9.
by bangaladore 8mo ago
CSP is inherently a client-side browser security feature, so yes.
10.
by bangaladore 8mo ago
That's certainly one of the things to be concerned with. Not certain how that's implemented, but I can still see there being holes in that strategy.
11.
by bangaladore 8mo ago
True. I suspect they will ban you depending on refusal frequency and severity.
12.
by bangaladore 8mo ago
Very much so. It feels like it can't have been that common in the original training corpus. Probably more common now given that we are training slop generators with slop.
13.
by bangaladore 8mo ago
More concerned (for the author) of someone trying to host/show illegal material. AI guardrails can only be so effective.
14.
by bangaladore 8mo ago
So SFT cost less only low hundreds of dollars? (1-10$ per hour per H100 if I'm seeing this correctly). What about SFT? Presumably basing this of Qwen is the reason it can be done for so cheap?
15.
by bangaladore 8mo ago
It doesn't help that the TPM spec is so full of optional features (and the N spec versions), so it's often annoying to find out what the vendor even supports without signing an NDA + some. TPMs work great when you have a mountain
16.
by bangaladore 8mo ago
In many industries, once someone has physical access to a device, all bets are off. And when used correctly, TPMs can provide tons of value even when not encrypting the bus.
17.
by bangaladore 9mo ago
Which is stupid as those are the vulnerabilities worth determining if they exist. I can understand in a heavily regulated industry (e.g. Medical) that a company couldn't due to liability give you the go ahead to poke into other user&#x
18.
by bangaladore 9mo ago
The best part is if you consider it a vulnerability, it is one you can't fix. It reminds me of SQL injection techniques where you have to exfiltrate the data using weird data types. Like encoding all emails as dates or numbers using (s
19.
by bangaladore 9mo ago
Is the idea that you'd have to guess the GUID of a future chat? If so that is impossible in practice. And even if you could, what's the outcome? Get someone to miss a train? Certainly not "clear" based off what was descr
20.
by bangaladore 9mo ago
Your "substance" is "trust Apple will enforce something correctly where there isn't a correct answer". I don't agree with that. Apple has a history of interpreting things favorably for themselves and locking 3r
21.
by bangaladore 9mo ago
> It’s literally their project and seems to meet their requirements. This is meaningless. Apple can carve out special exceptions for themselves all day long.
22.
by bangaladore 9mo ago
Sorry if I wasn't clear. I meant the WebKit guidelines were from the commenter, not from the apple page. > or features that improve memory safety within other languages, within the alternative web browser engine at a minimum for all
23.
by bangaladore 9mo ago
That's the commenter, not from the Apple page as far as I can tell. My point is the requirement is too broad. It cannot be meaningfully enforced.
24.
by bangaladore 9mo ago
> Use memory-safe programming languages, or features that improve memory safety within other languages, within the alternative web browser engine at a minimum for all code that processes web content; There is absolutely zero way to satis
25.
by bangaladore 9mo ago
My question is why are multiple people commenting that "Rob Pike" in particular should use this feature.
26.
by bangaladore 9mo ago
What do you mean? I did some quick googling and am unsure what you are implying here.
27.
by bangaladore 9mo ago
A platform that allows hiding of text locked behind a login is, in my opinion, garbage. This is done for the same reason Threads blocks all access without a login and mostly twitter to. Its to force account creation, collection of user data
28.
by bangaladore 9mo ago
Must sign in to read? Wow bluesky has already enshittified faster than expected. (for the record, the downvoters are the same people who would say this to someone who linked a twitter post, they just don't realize that)
29.
by bangaladore 9mo ago
The problem is companies like OpenAI have the upper hand here as they show with the Codex models. Which is what I was mentioning elsewhere. They build huge models with infinite money and distill them for certain tasks. Cursor doesn't h
30.
by bangaladore 9mo ago
As the other commenter stated, I don't use CLIs for development. I use VSCode. I'm very pro IDE. I've built up an entire collection of VSCode extensions and workflows for programming, building, customizing build & debuggi

More ›