baileypumfleet

5 ms·

1.
by baileypumfleet 5mo ago
That's exactly how this read to me too. Ultimately, the whole article is written by a company that does AI vulnerability scanning, and it's to try and get you to sign up for their service. As it mentions in their article, Strix ac
2.
by baileypumfleet 5mo ago
We've run an extremely profitable business for five years, raised a seed and a Series A, and grown at 300% a year sustainably while being open source. Going closed source actually hurts our business more than it benefits it. But it ult
3.
by baileypumfleet 5mo ago
That's absolutely our plan. We have bug bounty programs, we have internal AI scanners, we have manual penetration testing, and a number of other things that enable us to push really hard to find this stuff internally rather than relyin
4.
by baileypumfleet 5mo ago
As I mentioned above, we actually do run these AI scanners on our code, but the problem is it's simply not enough. These AI scanners, including STRIX, don't find everything. Each scanning tool actually finds different results from
5.
by baileypumfleet 5mo ago
We actually run AI scanners on our code internally, so we get the benefit of security through obscurity while also layering on AI vulnerability scanning, manual human penetration testing, and a huge array of other defence mechanisms.
6.
by baileypumfleet 4y ago
The AGPL is more to clear up confusion and try and limit people ripping off our software. Open source definitely isn’t a growth strategy for us. We’re huge open source fans, and do actually believe in what it stands for. We’re open source f
7.
by baileypumfleet 4y ago
All we need is a name and email for your guest. All data is being handled in a way that’s secure and private (we’re open source, you can check the code that touches your calendar), plus for internal security we are SOC 2 compliant and 99% o
8.
by baileypumfleet 4y ago
It’s decorative. Maybe we’ll make it interactive in the future, that could be cool
9.
by baileypumfleet 4y ago
The other comments are right: the full availability page once you get within the app will let you set whatever hours you want. We will fix this ASAP though!
10.
by baileypumfleet 4y ago
Hey - one of the cofounders here. There’s a lot of reasons why we’re open core. First is longevity. Especially considering we’re a startup, if a huge company is evaluating using our product, they’re going to wonder if we’re going to disappe
11.
by baileypumfleet 4y ago
Hey - one of the cofounders here. We’re experiencing our biggest spike in signups yet (see cal.com/open for the data), so our database got overwhelmed for a second. Rest assured, we’re on it :)
12.
by baileypumfleet 4y ago
Hey - one of the cofounders here. That’s a great question. When you connect your calendar with most scheduling apps, there’s really nothing stopping most of them from doing malicious things behind the scenes with your data. You don’t really
13.
by baileypumfleet 4y ago
Hey - one of the cofounders here. It’s exactly this. I totally get the point that’s being made, but to be able to have a product which is good enough to sell, we have to be able to cater to the hundreds of features that customers tell us we
14.
by baileypumfleet 5y ago
I've tested it on Chrome, Firefox and Safari and all three work. We've removed the animations regardless. Does it work now?
15.
Calendso: An open source Calendly alternative(calendso.com)
311 points by baileypumfleet 5y ago|91 comments