baggiponte

5 ms·

1.
by baggiponte 1y ago
I’m afraid you missed a bit the mark :( This is the equivalent of LSP but for coding agents. So any editor does not have to rebuild an interface to support each and every new one.
2.
by baggiponte 1y ago
Really hope for this to get traction so I’m not bound to the usual IDE
3.
by baggiponte 1y ago
i think it's good to let them experiment! cargo (and go?) offers this already, so why not.
4.
by baggiponte 1y ago
uv ruffy sounds funny
5.
by baggiponte 1y ago
Wow I never realized how much mistral was “disconnected” from the ecosystem
6.
by baggiponte 1y ago
How’s this different from xml?
7.
by baggiponte 1y ago
Yeah. The docs tell you that you should build it yourself, but…
8.
by baggiponte 1y ago
Litestar is really underrated but deserves much more usage! I’ve been meaning to try it for at least a year now, but always felt a bit scary to tell the team “hey let’s deviate from our stack”
9.
by baggiponte 1y ago
Yeah they might be good but the marketing is really bold and, to a certain extent, arrogant if not outright disgusting.
10.
by baggiponte 1y ago
BasedPyright is much better than pyright! Must use.
11.
by baggiponte 1y ago
That’s not true, they have been developing it as red knot for a good while :)
12.
by baggiponte 1y ago
You basically pay databricks a “fee” to choose the more appropriate and modern stack for you to build on, and keep it up to date. Never used it, but it handles with lots of the administrative bs (compliance, SLAs, idk) for you so you can ju
13.
by baggiponte 1y ago
This looks so dope!
14.
by baggiponte 1y ago
sqlalchemy doesn’t really accepts strings - if you do, you need to pass them into a “conn.execute(text(…))”, so end users should not face a breaking change.
15.
by baggiponte 1y ago
Type checkers to the rescue ahaha I think db.get could also raise if the type does not match?
16.
by baggiponte 2y ago
OpenAI coping so hard
17.
by baggiponte 2y ago
he's coping so hard.
18.
by baggiponte 2y ago
Oh you maintain PyTorch right?
19.
by baggiponte 2y ago
Absolutely. No second thoughts.
20.
by baggiponte 2y ago
also a whole bunch of new features (--script mode), speed of development, a stacked team.
21.
by baggiponte 2y ago
Yes but only for linting (the flake8 rules etc). The end goal is to have proper type checking and, I think, proper LSP refactoring capabilities.
22.
by baggiponte 2y ago
they are working on it! the internal name is currently red-knot (you can see it in their GH History and in the discord). First thing is a type checker, I think, then the renaming capabilities and such.
23.
by baggiponte 2y ago
Super interested. Do you have an equivalent of vLLM? Did you have to rewrite batching, paged attention…?
24.
by baggiponte 2y ago
Uuuh can you tell a bit more about wasabi, the Python LSP? Saw a post years ago and been eager to see whether it’d be open sourced (or why it wouldn’t).
25.
by baggiponte 2y ago
Have you seen two “prototypes” of standard for LLM telemetry? One is openllmetry, maintained by the folks at TraceLoop. Seems the more popular. The other one is openinference IIRC, by Arize AI.
26.
by baggiponte 2y ago
I wouldn't say it's an escape hatch: pip and poetry/pdm/uv serve different purposes. I am not sure what you refer to with `Pipfile`. As per the "command converter": you mean something like from `uv pip` to `uv
27.
by baggiponte 2y ago
There's an issue about pytorch (I think you might already have seen it since you encountered this). This is still due to lack of support for pinning a package to a third party index (see https://github.com/astral-sh&#x2
28.
by baggiponte 2y ago
You are correct - I should've been more specific. Binding a package(s) to a third party index is currently unsupported (see issue: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/171 ) as it is something that pip
29.
by baggiponte 2y ago
it's an absolute beast. They need to add a couple minor painful paths that people usually use package managers with (private indexes, binding packages to third party indexes...) but if you don't need fancy corner cases, it's
30.
by baggiponte 2y ago
Interesting! Too bad it’s just about two of them.

More ›