badloginagain

9 ms·

1.
by badloginagain 1y ago
If remember correctly, this was put in by Trump first round, set to activate when Biden was in office. Now Trump second round fixes it, but expires in next (presumably) Democrat administration.
2.
by badloginagain 1y ago
Which is funny because US industrial investment was on a tear pre-tariff as companies near/on-shored at historic rates. Not only were tariff's not needed, they've effectively shut down their intended goal.
3.
by badloginagain 1y ago
I hate the fact that CI peaked with Jenkins. I hate Jenkins, I hate Groovy, but for every company I've worked for there's been a 6-year-uptime Jenkins instance casually holding up the entire company. There's probably a lesson
4.
by badloginagain 3y ago
Yo I just heard about MidJourney this year. And this appears to be a local runtime stable diffusion streaming library? Bruh.
5.
by badloginagain 3y ago
Now that you mention it I have to agree, they've released a ton of stuff. Actually biggest complaint is they don't continue supporting it half the time, but they OS a lot of things.
6.
by badloginagain 3y ago
Thanks for the link, interesting. I just don't see Meta's role-- where is their monopoly in the stack? MSFT seems to have a much clearer compliment. They own the servers OAI run on. They would loooove for OAI competitors to also r
7.
by badloginagain 3y ago
So Microsoft's definition of winning is being the host for AI inference products/services. Startups make useful AI products, MSFT collects tax from them and build ever more data centers. I haven't thought too critically yet a
8.
by badloginagain 3y ago
The real danger I see is targeted AI scams against high value targets. How much money would someone be willing to spend to capture Elon entering his eX-Twitter password?
9.
by badloginagain 3y ago
Arguments: 1. The danger of AI is they confuse humans to trust them as friends instead of as services. 2. The corporations running those services are incentivized to capitalize on that confusion. 3. Government is obligated to regulate the c
10.
by badloginagain 3y ago
Let your ears decide: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghUs-84NAAU
11.
Music is the cellular automaton of how sounds make humans feel(jerkytreats.notion.site)
2 points by badloginagain 3y ago|1 comments
12.
by badloginagain 3y ago
And we're seeing the result in real-time. Stupid shit doers have been replaced with hopefully-less-stupid-shit-doers. It's a real shame too, because this is a clear loss for the AI Alignment crowd. I'm on the fence about the
13.
by badloginagain 3y ago
I feel we hold up single-observability-solution as the Holy Grail, and I can see the argument for it- one place to understand the health of your services. But I've also been in terrible vendor lock-in situations, being bent over the ba
14.
by badloginagain 3y ago
"Here is an attempt at ethical, non-sexual haikus for and against Kubernetes" Amazing how far we've come.
15.
by badloginagain 3y ago
We then train the LLM on all code optimized like this.
16.
by badloginagain 3y ago
How "far fetched" this is from click fraud is the central argument, and I can easily see a range of arguments from both sides. On one hand, distributing and marketing a tool that is explicitly designed to harm trackers can be seen
17.
by badloginagain 3y ago
Make it a thread on X
18.
by badloginagain 3y ago
US healthcare could accurately be described as the literal worst case scenario.
19.
by badloginagain 3y ago
If I understand correctly, the meat of the argument is "that is a system for every (∀) task, there exists (∃) a setting that gives the correct answer for that one task." My understanding of this (correct me if I'm wrong) is t
20.
by badloginagain 3y ago
Which is insane to think about given the hard open-source "engineer first" pivot Satya has taken the company. It's like Windows team is committed to building the complete antithesis of that vision.
21.
by badloginagain 3y ago
Peter Zeihan's take is that urbanization leads to less children because there's less space, you don't need the free labor kids provides on the farm, and children are very expensive in the city. This is coupled with the speed
22.
by badloginagain 3y ago
> huge raging asshole That's not really how he described it. His point is that the raw model that became GPT-4 would do literally anything it asked you to. It would write fascist propaganda just as readily as it would offer medical
23.
by badloginagain 3y ago
2010's were definitely all about putting a phone in every humans hands.
24.
by badloginagain 3y ago
I'm still on the fence about Substack. I'll have people I follow use Substack, the trick being after some amount of time their work becomes premium access only. On one hand, I suppose paying people for their insights is legitimate
25.
by badloginagain 3y ago
But they haven't built any cybertrucks
26.
by badloginagain 3y ago
I forget where, but someone from OpenAI said that that the next GPT is "all about the data". I wonder if you have pre-training data that is fully factual, high quality, with perfect logic will result in a LLM that doesn't fal
27.
by badloginagain 3y ago
There's a bunch of loosely connected points here, but the author seems to take umbrage with the inability of GPT4 to break its alignment training of referring to itself as an AI language model. If anything, the author is demonstrating
28.
by badloginagain 3y ago
That makes no sense. The one thing chatgpt does _really_ well is setup unit tests, which is the part of unit tests I hate. My ChatGPT workflow is give requirements -> have it create unit tests -> give it test results until it passes.
29.
by badloginagain 3y ago
I'm glad our AI overlords are as bamboozled by python vs. python3 as us lowly humans
30.
by badloginagain 4y ago
If they lost $3.3b, it's what, .9175 : 1 ? So nominal price should be $.9175 on the dollar presumably. Add in another couple bips for the uncertainty. Edit: It would be actually hilarious if USDC failed because the banking system. I d

More ›