awesomeMilou

7 ms·

1.
by awesomeMilou 4d ago
Yeah its soooo interesting! Totally not dystopian, just soooo interesting and fascinating to ponder these scenarios in which corporations hold equal power to national governments! Just such a curious scenario to let your mind wander about,
2.
by awesomeMilou 8d ago
That was.. obvious? How are you shocked? Honestly, how insane must the suspension of disbelief on this site be, that anyone here is shocked?
3.
by awesomeMilou 1mo ago
This comment is funny, because Berkshire Hathaway's exposure in the housing market uses basically what you said as it's strategy memo.
4.
by awesomeMilou 3mo ago
Hmm I would have hoped for something more formal and that's focused on compiled runtimes, instead of dynamic runtimes Still, I appreciate you replying, I'm sure you meant to be helpful!
5.
by awesomeMilou 3mo ago
Is there also a self guided course for "basic compilers", before stepping into an advanced level?
6.
by awesomeMilou 3mo ago
it's so nice watching HN derive fundamental human rights and basic theories of marxism for themselves. except no, that's probably not whats going to happen, unless you want to explain to me why there have been voices calling for g
7.
by awesomeMilou 3mo ago
you should have read marx, owning the means of production is a fundamental requirement for communism, rendering currency obsolete. one thing that's usually left out though, is that the means of production also have to be so stupidly e
8.
by awesomeMilou 3mo ago
> Demonizing people creating things is petty and unbecoming for a political movement. i think a more rational argument would claim that this isn't about demonizing people who create, it's about societal inequality. i don't
9.
by awesomeMilou 3mo ago
per that rationale, since contributions are valued solely by the relative capital value they generate, do you think it would make sense to define the value of a person solely by the value of their contributions?
10.
by awesomeMilou 3mo ago
Yeah okay fair, I was about to post a knee jerk reaction, but it's well known that the US government can obtain higher quality data by just simply buying it from the public market.
11.
by awesomeMilou 3mo ago
By completely eliminating the need for a human workforce, therefore rendering a majority of humanity obsolete, therefore lots of social inequality, therefore lots of starvation, poverty and death. When billionaires say "think about the
12.
by awesomeMilou 4mo ago
havent heard taste being a defining factor in building farming robots that can replace labor. "doing shit fast and good enough" seems to be a much better fitness function here
13.
by awesomeMilou 4mo ago
Because of the replies, I can't tell if this post is dripping with sarcasm or not.
14.
by awesomeMilou 5mo ago
Excercising your rights is a duty, responsibility and experience that is individual to everyone.
15.
by awesomeMilou 5mo ago
I thought this was abandoned?
16.
by awesomeMilou 5mo ago
I don't know, maybe it's the absolute fucking _insane_ social inequality that is present around the globe and in the world. Also isn't Jerry Seinfeld a billionaire? Completely detached from reality.
17.
by awesomeMilou 5mo ago
Honestly, even assuming a bias, I doubt it's attractiveness. What's usually cited with hiring older employees is the additional social cost, as well as time off work (because they often have families to support and are more settle
18.
by awesomeMilou 6mo ago
this was more about the person being narrow minded on a website that brands itself for the out-of-the-box thinkers.
19.
by awesomeMilou 6mo ago
> It’s like Marc Andressen bloviating about how AI will replace everyone except him. It's honestly insane that they think this. They really don't understand that they're building something they cannot possibly control, if
20.
by awesomeMilou 6mo ago
I'm a software engineer and _I_ don't understand the aesthetic value of code. I'm interested in architecture and maintainability but I couldn't give a rats ass on how some section of code looks like, so long as it confor
21.
by awesomeMilou 6mo ago
What I don't get is that there should now be focus on the actual engineering part of software development. I have arguments with people about code quality, styling, how "structured" some work is, when in reality, in an engine
22.
by awesomeMilou 6mo ago
Then if they succeed, I guess you're going to see a different process for the first time in your life. On a website where we frequently talk about disruptive business models, this whole attitude kinda stinks.
23.
by awesomeMilou 6mo ago
Jesus we fucking KNOW already
24.
by awesomeMilou 6mo ago
I just want to reply, a few days after the fact: What you describe would be illegal in my country. Save for me insulting your basic human dignity, i.e. if I were to call you subhuman or something like that (which I'm not, this is an ex
25.
by awesomeMilou 6mo ago
Because the party has told you so, Winston!
26.
by awesomeMilou 6mo ago
I like to put down peoples achievements to cope too sometimes, though usually not by insulting their code. This kid is likely only able to do what they're doing because their Mom and Dad can afford to buy them the tools (mainly a 3D pr
27.
by awesomeMilou 6mo ago
How would you model your business like this? Like what tools / literature can you recommend?
28.
by awesomeMilou 6mo ago
The last time fascists rose to power in the west, they were heavily pandering to the working class as well. I'd take statements originating from their political camp as largely calculated.
29.
by awesomeMilou 6mo ago
Won't the epoxy run out at some point?
30.
by awesomeMilou 6mo ago
But they are? And it's a fallacy to assume that critical thinking is something that you're born with. In addition to the media landscape being completely ingrained into society. I can't really escape recommender engines anymo

More ›