auung

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by auung 2y ago

   The Cass Review covers a lot of ground. Which parts of relevance to that article are you claiming have been "debunked", and on what basis?
2. 2.▲
   by auung 2y ago

   Did you read this section of the paper? > Our study has several limitations. First, its retrospective design meant we were unable to measure patient satisfaction and quality-of-life outcomes. Complications and any mention of regret were
3. 3.▲
   by auung 2y ago

   Do you have any substantive criticism you could share?
4. 4.▲
   by auung 2y ago

   > The number of those kinds of surgeries people claim to be "oh so concerned" about is in the low double digits--generally low single digits--normally zero in a year. In the US it's hundreds of such surgeries each year, an