austinthetaco

5 ms·

1.
by austinthetaco 7d ago
most of their innovations are in stuff that would be boring to go into detail with. They talked about the advancements in their A series processors (but you left that out), they talk about their complex layering to prevent a crease from for
2.
by austinthetaco 1mo ago
only because you're arguing in bad faith. The layperson does not consider the result of standard sensor debayering to be "processed".
3.
by austinthetaco 1mo ago
It's still not a jpeg
4.
by austinthetaco 1mo ago
raw images exist
5.
by austinthetaco 1mo ago
I'm not the person you are replying to, but the readme is very clearly written by an AI, and it sounds nothing like his older work. Sometimes it's just super clear to people something is written with AI without you getting some so
6.
by austinthetaco 1mo ago
if you were around long enough, you would know that: A) thats not a rule B) that was added to the guidelines because people were complaining about article choices.
7.
by austinthetaco 1mo ago
your account is 5 months old, also that's not a rule.
8.
by austinthetaco 1mo ago
I'm getting very tired of the redditification of HN. This place used to not be like this.
9.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
This has gotta be a troll man. They aren't responsible for poor security measures. They are only responsible for what is outlined in the thing they pay for. I'm gonna mute this thread purely because I'm pretty certain you&#x2
10.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
that is not correct in the slightest. It would only be your blame if you built and managed the lab. The lab is not US owned or managed, it's up to the lab who claims they can safely work on dangerous viruses to ensure that they keep it
11.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
What does that have to do with anything? If I pay the salary of a driver and they decide to drink and run over a family it's in no way my fault.
12.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
> Modern UX is bad because many front-end programmers fundamentally just do not care about the UX, it's not about the specific tech they use. This is untrue and is weird misunderstanding on your part. Most of modern UX and UI is des
13.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
The level of effort is minimal. It's not a quantitative definition, its qualitative. Also absolutely in no way shape or form is it anywhere near the level of decision making of a director. Your average director of some low budget B net
14.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
The experts in the sciences usually back their claims up using citations, and can be disproven through the normal methods of disproving citations. not through "vibes"
15.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
yes, they would, they still didnt make the coffee though. They would likely get banned from said coffee shop if they then went around the room claiming they made the coffee.
16.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
It's the level of effort and involvement (also if you listen to any director talk they will never say "I made", they will say "we made"). Similarly to AI, nobody gives credit to the guy who "thought of the idea
17.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
im so tired of seeing AI writing on articles like this. We've been studying classical art for hundreds of years theres so many resources I beg readers to just pick up one of the countless books or articles written by a human and i beg
18.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
there is a pretty stark difference between independent US companies copying each other and a state backed chinese company taking data and IP from american citizens.
19.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
This is weird and reactionary. Lots of organizations are continuing to refuse to use chinese models due to security and IP concerns. Anthropic/american models aren't going anywhere anytime soon.
20.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
my only issue is that it cares if you are off by 1 minute, meanwhile in the real world a lot of analog clocks have continuously moving minutes and a lot of others have ticking minutes (they only move right at the minute mark).
21.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
Its not essential. Good organization. Good functional configuration. Proper separation. Good variable naming. All of these things are what make it more than easy to work without type declaration. People have been working on huge code bases
22.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
They have said time and time again it was because their C# team was writing frontend code in a huge codebase and wanted similar support.
23.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
You really should just not assume things about people with no reason other than "they dont like the things i like so therefor they must not be experienced". I've worked on plenty of very very large codebases with large teams.
24.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
I still do argue that for JS. I have yet to see it worth the effort other than making things feel comfortable for former OOP devs coming from other languages. edit: the downvote button HN is not for disagreeing with comments or unpopular op
25.
by austinthetaco 2mo ago
I'm still not sold on typescript. I've used it off and on professionally for years and it has always just felt like a maneuver to create a safehaven to C# and java devs scrambling to find roles in the modern landscape. Doing purel
26.
by austinthetaco 3mo ago
for CVE's, maybe.
27.
by austinthetaco 3mo ago
You couldn't have possibly verified that. Stock prediction based on what? What's your sample size over what period of time? Using what indicators? how far is your lookback?
28.
by austinthetaco 3mo ago
that works for people you regularly watch, but what about the people that put out the rare random great video. or a video on a topic when you're trying to fix something. People dont subscribe to those patreons, and thus those kind of c
29.
by austinthetaco 3mo ago
Was this comment made by an LLM? i dont know anyone who drops "blast radius" in casual conversation besides claude.
30.
by austinthetaco 4mo ago
Thats because the user stopped becoming the customer from the point of view of the development team. The customer is now people who deal in data collection and analytics and gates and funnels.

More ›