austinjp

5 ms·

1.
by austinjp 4mo ago
Find people in her field who are already hopping on the wave. Better still, gently persuade her to find those people. She'll probably know where to look. In fact, I'd be surprised if her professional newsletters aren't alrea
2.
by austinjp 4mo ago
So... ummm... the website and all the submitter's comments here seem very Claude generated, no? Spam filters are going to have to get a lot more sophisticated. "Slop" filters, even.
3.
by austinjp 5mo ago
I'm unsure of how this information is being presented. But it's entirely possible for the majority of people on Earth to avoid all those things. And it's entirely possible for many people who are (perhaps unwittingly) funding
4.
by austinjp 5mo ago
> It's already illegal to threaten journalists [in] America Not necessarily, it depends on the pressure and the intent. > In America we generally make bad things illegal, not activities that could become motivation for bad things
5.
by austinjp 5mo ago
Polymarket gamblers have pressured at least one journalist regarding reporting of missile strikes. This requires regulation or, as others here have suggested, non-anonymity, maybe other measures too. https://www.theguardian.com&#
6.
by austinjp 5mo ago
A crossword puzzle generator, just for fun. Grid generator in Python because it's easy to hack around and grid generation doesn't need to be particularly fast. Go for populating the grid with words because with large grids there a
7.
by austinjp 5mo ago
It very much depends on the crime. The truly awful stuff is committed by intelligent people.
8.
by austinjp 5mo ago
And there's always a product provider who's willing to add that flag, despite all the warnings.
9.
by austinjp 6mo ago
To save people the digging, here's the git repo: https://github.com/dmtrKovalenko/fff.nvim "FFF stands for freakin fast fuzzy file finder (pick 3) and it is an opinionated fuzzy file picker for your AI agent
10.
by austinjp 6mo ago
Kudos for listing the things you're *not* willing to work on, and for those things in particular.
11.
by austinjp 6mo ago
Erm.... you're not exactly proving them wrong are you.
12.
by austinjp 6mo ago
I feel this sneaking up on me. I've only recently allowed Claude to actually edit some files directly, rather than just show me suggested edits. It could certainly be addictive to just hit enter while code magically appears, thinking &
13.
by austinjp 6mo ago
> rapidly leading to task paralysis with the sheer scale of the plan. Yikes. I feel seen .
14.
by austinjp 6mo ago
So let's say there's a causative link (see other comments here for why this may not be the case), it would take a lifetime of daily complex spatial navigation for several hours every day to significantly reduce Alzheimer's di
15.
by austinjp 6mo ago
Oh I'm sure the grifters will find ways in. The other disciplines may have provided a "moat" for the past few decades, but it won't last forever.
16.
by austinjp 6mo ago
I'm not so sure. It's definitely the de facto standard, but I suspect minimal HTML is better. Just enough tags to add structure and meaning (H1-H6, p, a, em, section for structure including nesting, maybe more). LLMs were trained
17.
by austinjp 6mo ago
Yep both are widely used. I forget which markdowns extensions they originated from. The Pandoc website probably has the details.
18.
by austinjp 6mo ago
It uses MJML under the hood. https://mjml.io/
19.
by austinjp 6mo ago
Whether you can or can't in reality is moot, unfortunately. The literature search in biomedical fields should indeed be theoretically reproducible. I don't know about other fields, but it would seem odd to me if a search was no
20.
by austinjp 6mo ago
Quite probably there are differences between fields. In biomedical literature reviews the search terms and databases are detailed, and (in systematic reviews) a PRISMA flowchart [0] provided. The theory being that other researchers could re
21.
by austinjp 6mo ago
While your dashboard sounds fancy, this part raises issues: > I run ChatGPT Pro to collect all relevant papers Any literature review must be reproducible. If you can't say exactly what queries you ran against exactly what databases,
22.
by austinjp 6mo ago
Triple, according to Wikipedia.
23.
by austinjp 6mo ago
Well, how about you lower your head below your hand and twist your neck to bring your mouth level with the chopsticks?
24.
by austinjp 6mo ago
Note the "/s" at the end of their post, indicating sarcasm.
25.
by austinjp 6mo ago
\m/
26.
by austinjp 7mo ago
At least 15 years, if the git history is to be believed.
27.
by austinjp 7mo ago
I always feel this argument misses a point. SkyNet may still be a long way off, but autonomous killer drones are here. That is a bad situation my dudes. Every step on the journey towards SkyNet is worse than the preceding step. Let's
28.
by austinjp 7mo ago
> Every frontier tech company is convinced that the tech they are working towards is as humanity-useful as a cure for cancer, and yet as dangerous as nuclear weapons. Amd they alone are responsible enough to govern it.
29.
by austinjp 7mo ago
Slightly off-topic, but.... the website is grindingly slow on my Samsung Galaxy A16 with Firefox. To the point that typing is a chore. Can you slim it down? Potential customers will not want to see such a slow interface.
30.
by austinjp 7mo ago
Food? Some products sold as food are most certainly addictive. Video games? As just one example, Candy Crush is a vacuous waste of anyone's time and money, with plenty of tales of addiction. Books? People used to think novels were addi

More ›