augment001

6 ms·

1.
by augment001 3y ago
> Its not a false premise, there has been many anthropological studies that form the basis for catastrophism, extinction and a changing earth, they have been backed up with evidence for hundreds of years. Did these past catastrophes invo
2.
by augment001 3y ago
It’s more than slightly overstated. It’s a total lie. Showing up at someone’s house and killing someone because they have your phone is always illegal in every US state. I don’t know why people are trying to defend this. It’s complete mis
3.
by augment001 3y ago
I don’t think so. Can you quote something that Sangeeth wrote that indicates how they disagree with me?
4.
by augment001 3y ago
How is that relevant to Sangeeth69’s comment? There doesn’t seem to be any connection between what they said and what I said.
5.
by augment001 3y ago
Can you explain how this has any relevance at all to going to someone else’s house and killing them because you wrongly think your cellphone is somewhere nearby? As far as I can see the person who I was replying to is simply making this up.
6.
by augment001 3y ago
I think you’re spreading misinformation. I hope it’s not intentional. There is not a single state in the US where it is legal to shoot someone just for being on your property.
7.
by augment001 3y ago
In what state is it legal to kill people for stealing your stuff?
8.
by augment001 3y ago
I’m curious why you imagine anyone is expecting that?
9.
by augment001 3y ago
There are technologists other than Apple who could help them understand.
10.
by augment001 3y ago
Expecting journalists to have an answer before writing a piece is very reasonable.
11.
by augment001 3y ago
Apple always has two choices. Adapt or die. They always respond in the same way. They adapt to provide integrated end user benefits from emerging technologies, and expose those technologies to developers on their platforms. Why would thi
12.
by augment001 3y ago
Why not?
13.
by augment001 3y ago
Sure, but if you buy something and it’s not delivered and there is no customer service department, it’s probably the best recourse.
14.
by augment001 3y ago
Why not just cancel the payment?
15.
by augment001 3y ago
> The contention is if history has gone through multiple and innumerable cycles and has ended up at the same outcome multiple times before. The first problem is that this is simply a false premise. Very few people would make such a clai
16.
by augment001 3y ago
Clinging to dogma isn't a strategy either. If we're trading catchphrases, here's one I prefer: "In times of change learners inherit the earth while the learned find themselves beautifully equipped to deal with a world th
17.
by augment001 3y ago
> There's a lot of written history showing this. All of which comes from an era without the public internet, the smartphone, or AI.
18.
by augment001 3y ago
This doesn’t seem practical. Anyone with a bike could side-swipe a car to get a payout. And consider the less malicious case of an out of control cyclist leading to cars swerving into pedestrians to avoid hitting the bike.
19.
by augment001 3y ago
Not really, unless you think the foreign minister is the one in power.
20.
by augment001 3y ago
You first. This whole ‘metrics’ question is a distraction. If you can explain why your argument doesn’t apply to Finland, I’ll point you to a news report showing China’s support for Russia.
21.
by augment001 3y ago
It’s not my job to inform you. If you don’t think China is supporting Russia’s position then you need to do some reading. Also, I guess you can’t explain why Finland isn’t Russia’s best friend despite bordering Russia.
22.
by augment001 3y ago
I guess you haven’t been watching the news.
23.
by augment001 3y ago
Honestly, that’s not an explanation. If one of your neighbors was beating up and stealing from another of your neighbors, are your really saying you’d cosy up to them? By this logic you’d expect Finland to be Russia’s best friend. I am cri
24.
by augment001 3y ago
> China doesn't support aggression in Ukraine and have made that much clear. Would you mind explaining where they have made it clear? All I’ve seen are statements blaming it on the US for being open to new NATO members.
25.
by augment001 3y ago
> China is bordering Russia. If you think that somehow doesn't change the type of relationship both parties are forced to have you don't understand geopolitics. Can you explain what you are thinking? One implication is that Ch
26.
by augment001 3y ago
> Anyone saying "China also wants an empire" or "Empire is inevitable" is categorically wrong, though, or at the very least has not at all engaged with the essay above. This is frankly, silly. The essay is just double
27.
by augment001 3y ago
This always confuses me - how can you appear in a video call if you’re wearing a headset?
28.
by augment001 3y ago
The article doesn't say they used Bing. It says ChatGPT.
29.
by augment001 3y ago
From the piece: "I think this is a pretty stark wake-up call. The system is portrayed as being credible and informative and authoritative, and it's obviously not." Nowhere does openAI 'portray' ChatGPT this way, and
30.
by augment001 3y ago
Are you sure they did? There is a recent claim that they did from a random South Korean outlet with no track record of being correct on such claims. If you Google, you’ll see that “Apple cuts production on low demand” claims are made once o

More ›