Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
audelair
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
1.
▲
by
audelair
11mo ago
The documentation needs a lot of work, especially since a lot of it is outdated. But in short, if you setup a reverse proxy, the listeners in Stalwart will listen to anything forwarded to it, so you'll generally want to refer to the HT
2.
▲
by
audelair
11mo ago
This is awesome to hear, thank you. I have more-or-less figured out how to configure things, and finally found the "local configuration keys" section, but I think I can live with the current setup (mixed toml + db) until Version 1
3.
▲
by
audelair
11mo ago
The nice thing about S3-compatible blob storage is that it is extremely easy to move the objects to another provider (or roll your own MinIO or similar setup) and point your server to it. I initially went with the File-System since it made
4.
▲
by
audelair
11mo ago
I feel like the developer is just as serious about containerized setup as letting it take over the whole box. I've run it both ways, and have found it works incredibly well in Docker and the documentation is very good at treating all s
5.
▲
by
audelair
11mo ago
I have had similarly been unable to get as much help from their Discord as I had hoped. That said, I'd give this another shot. What I discovered is that Stalwart is incredibly flexible and designed to be used in any configuration you w
6.
▲
by
audelair
11mo ago
But the messages are accessible by every open standard: POP, IMAP, JMAP. You can also pick your storage backend, your database backend, your full text/search tool or provider, directory backend. It is amazingly versatile. Between all t
7.
▲
by
audelair
11mo ago
I'm cautiously optimistic that Stalwart is a game-changer. I would normally stick with a simpler platform (like mox) if I wasn't interested in the groupware space. I've previously tried Nextcloud and SoGo and left disappointe
8.
▲
by
audelair
11mo ago
I do have to hand it to the developer though. This is some serious longterm commitment to an open standard that has simply never taken off beyond one company (Fastmail). Current JMAP implementation is pretty much nonexistent, and I am back
9.
▲
by
audelair
11mo ago
I heard some second-hand accounts that Hetzner's object storage was pretty slow even in the same location. For email, that sounded not too ideal. Also, I only have 5 mailboxes right now holding less than 15GB of data total... S3 is sti
10.
▲
by
audelair
11mo ago
I tried very hard to get it to work, but I simply couldn't get it to connect with my Stalwart instance over JMAP. I do have the permissive CORS and end-points and proxy-protocol seemingly working with my test HTTPS requests, and I also
11.
▲
by
audelair
11mo ago
Not sure if yours is setup different, but there are several key fields that need to be written to the config.toml file, and I've seen my file get updated when I make changes to the listeners or stores settings. But in general, I agree
12.
▲
by
audelair
1y ago
I am basically all in on Stalwart right now, but do not have the time to deal with email deliverability issues or asking my VPS to open a port, so I have been using AWS SES as the SMTP relay for awhile. No problems so far, hosting about a d
13.
▲
by
audelair
1y ago
I also love Technitium, and excited about some of the features that are coming soon. PostgreSQL for logs, aggregated view for viewing activity across multiple servers. The developer is also very active on Reddit and Patreon.
14.
▲
by
audelair
4y ago
My daughter started on MX Linux at 5 and knows her way around pretty well... I chose it because I wanted something easy but lightweight, since we were repurposing an old Sandy Bridge laptop. Now she is almost 8, we are building a new PC tog