attemptone

8 ms·

1.
by attemptone 20d ago
Doctor gave it to me and I reacted paradoxically to it. Worse depression and even more peculiar I picked up smoking again. I never felt such an urge to smoke in my life. Over the years I've been looking for an explanation for that reac
2.
by attemptone 2mo ago
I dont think so. Admittedtly I live in a peculiar bubble (mix of scientists, artists and programmers) but nobody that I know personally talks about chatbots in neutral terms, let alone in favorable ones. If we take chatgpt and the ones from
3.
by attemptone 2mo ago
Quoting a chatbot in an article that is not related to a chatbot felt offputting and weird. I had to stop reading, because it somehow undermined any interest i had in the article
4.
by attemptone 1y ago
difficulties in life and genetics are more of a reason to decelop a severe addiction. Quality is probably not so much of importance - people still smoke cigarettes and drink alcohol. It feels like we forgot about the opiod epidemic, meth, c
5.
by attemptone 1y ago
Easy and rather unending access to drugs is not that hard to achieve. One might even argue it is easier to achieve as a poor person. Besides what is a party related disease? Something like an STD, or more akin to a manic episode Cancer, str
6.
by attemptone 1y ago
>Humanity has discarded natural selection thanks to modern medicine. Gene mutations that would have meant someone didn't survive now can be treated. There is still selection going on and it is difficult to argue that it is not natur
7.
by attemptone 1y ago
I'd wager it is the strongest. Most of the arguments always argue in quantities. So and so much of energy waster per hour, this many job losses and that growing trend of delusions supported by LLMs. We've already seen it with clim
8.
by attemptone 1y ago
I checked the BlEU-Score and Perplexity of popular models and both have stagnated around 2021. As a disclaimer this was a cursory check and I didn't dive into the details of how individuals scores were evaluated.
9.
by attemptone 1y ago
We were talking about linear improvements and I have yet to see it
10.
by attemptone 1y ago
>I feel the opposite, and pretty much every metric we have shows basically linear improvement of these models over time. Wait, what kind of metric are you talking about? When I did my masters in 2023 SOTA models where trying to push the
11.
by attemptone 1y ago
I'm not sure what your comment is trying to convey. From my experience Meditations is basic and doesn't offer any substance. Popular Stoicism has a lot of legitimate criticism and is very often misused and glamorized in right-wing
12.
by attemptone 1y ago
How "subtle and insidious" is it really? I'd say it is shifting the blame of personal responsability to a website. Me and some of my friends use(d) 4chan and we never fell into the pipeline. To the contrary there is a strong
13.
by attemptone 2y ago
This might be too nitpicky, but isn't believe exactly what one has in absence of evidence?
14.
by attemptone 2y ago
4chan and I'm not ashamed of it. Even though it is anonymous you really feel a sense of community. Approach it as a creative writing exercise or as being part of a hive-mind and you'll find enjoyment in it. The amount of authentic
15.
by attemptone 2y ago
I beg to differ, I was interested and looked at flux pro. The rendering is impressive and looks like the output of a larger organization or a dedicated professional. But it's just that. It feels a bit like most people don't reall
16.
by attemptone 2y ago
Just the first few notes conjure an image of a slimebag. That kind of person that is only attentive if there is a personal gain to be made. Sometimes they're astoundingly obvious and oblivious to the obviousness. I wonder why that is?
17.
by attemptone 2y ago
We have to look not far from our own field to see a replication crisis brewing. The results in ML papers are obviously moving in the same direction, all while beating SOTA by miniscule amounts. IMO psychology became a lot less interesting w
18.
by attemptone 2y ago
The connection between beauty and pleasantness seems to be much weaker than suggested. There are things that are pleasent and lack any form of particular beauty. To mind come, interior decoration, roman statues, tiktok-videos.. And there ar
19.
by attemptone 3y ago
Correct me if I'm misunderstanding, you're putting forward the notion that the human mind is reducible to matrix-multiplications and gradient descent. This seems like such a strong claim, that I shouldn't be the one arguing f
20.
by attemptone 3y ago
Very human, why should I trust some matrix-multiplication and gradient descent on deeply personal questions. For sure that guy in the mirror looks amicable, but you don't get much out of it when trying to flirt with a mirror. I have to
21.
by attemptone 3y ago
It is very hard to ignore the instinct of replying to the toxic statement with a sarcastic "no u". Nevertheless I'll try to put this in neutral terms. Hopefully I get my point across without sounding too punchy. I'm at w
22.
by attemptone 3y ago
Following research instead of the industry would this make a basic fact known for a while.
23.
by attemptone 3y ago
Another mystical text calls life the ultimate rohrschach test. You're not making (logical) arguments but rather you're showing your hand.
24.
by attemptone 3y ago
Keeping in line with the style of that comment: No, they're not.
25.
by attemptone 3y ago
Wouldn't a Transformer LM try to write in a more conversational style?
26.
by attemptone 4y ago
News of a bad thing happening to someone far away does not really impact survival as well. The point was not about providing a good counter-example. I wanted to show that when one hand-waves away a behavoiur to an abstract selection criteri
27.
by attemptone 4y ago
We were also primed to seek comfort and stability. Because that ensured survival. Like OOP said, that was a surface level thought. Finding evidence in evolutionary psychology seems like a big leap from that.
28.
by attemptone 4y ago
For me it is the other way around. Scientist sound like laymen in philosophy when they want to bring their data into a larger context. They stumble to explain why certain connection can/cannot be made and how they come up with the impl
29.
by attemptone 4y ago
For the same reason I dismiss any paper from a department that focuses on 'Unified field theory' Or Computer Scientist that do research. Those eggheads can't see the forest because of all the trees. 'Is iT cOMputaBLE?&#
30.
by attemptone 4y ago
Not OP, but I see the also in problem with 'every possible entity'. If you formulate it like that the prompt is decoupled from the LLM capabilities and can be anything. And if you restrict the prompt to cover only what the LLM und

More ›