athrowaway3z

5 ms·

1.
by athrowaway3z 3d ago
Its your human experience that gave you a definition of "chess" that makes you think of chess as a two player physical game using nothing but your internal consciousness, not even using a scratch pad. Even by that last constraint,
2.
by athrowaway3z 3d ago
I will never understand people who consider this "cheating". > python3 and the python-chess library are available Why would we try to teach a model 'ethical' standards about how to play a game? They're tools. Its
3.
by athrowaway3z 4d ago
I want to ensure your PhD is actually from somebody who is acknowledged in the system of peers I bought into, before I want to risk wasting more of my time defining and explain while guessing at your ability to parse and understand them.
4.
by athrowaway3z 4d ago
Ok; but the other side is equally delusional. > "Oh we told the AI to use the tools, as well as to not use those tools. It chose to use the tools - we consider this cheating (for neabulous reasons), so lets get everybody in a panic
5.
by athrowaway3z 4d ago
Something like this sketch work for you? peer(X, 0) :- founding_peer(X). electorate(T, count<Y>) :- peer(Y, T). support(X, T, count<Y>) :- candidate(X), peer(Y, T), recognizes(Y, X, T+1). peer(X, T+1) :- support(X, T, Votes), e
6.
by athrowaway3z 5d ago
By peers. Peer in peer-reviewed is a logical coherent and functional definition with answers. The logical issue with 'peers' is how to bootstrap it. At that bootstrap moment you can ask "by whom?". We are several centuri
7.
by athrowaway3z 5d ago
For Google, the business side of you paying them doesn't work out as obvious as it might seem. Advertisers are sold the idea that 1000 clicks/impression is X dollars. The average impression might be priced at 1000/X$. But you
8.
by athrowaway3z 6d ago
> The capabilities of a model unlocks certain harness behaviour, and in its terms might be beneficial to automate more of your x, y, z. Not really. Sure its nice for a model to nativly be trained on understanding browsers & DOM/
9.
by athrowaway3z 6d ago
> I actually don’t know if the model thinks someone is looking It 'knows' (from simply training) with an extremely high degree of certainty when its prompt is written by an LLM/itself - and thus will change what it writes
10.
by athrowaway3z 6d ago
You are wrong. I honestly am having trouble understanding how you think these things work, and what you believe a harness is in the first place. There is the standard API that things like openRouter exposes, thats supported by every provide
11.
by athrowaway3z 7d ago
I suspect in your ideology you're conflating things like copyright and patents, with the separate issue of Attribution.
12.
by athrowaway3z 11d ago
To what end? The severity of capital punishment barely effects civilian crime numbers. Instead - and i have spent all of 10 seconds thinking this through - what about we just pay people to snitch on a business/employer if its knowingly
13.
by athrowaway3z 12d ago
The economics to do what planes do today make no sense; but i think that's making the analysis the wrong way around. There are opportunities for which airplanes have never made economic sense because they have big fixed costs like pilo
14.
by athrowaway3z 13d ago
Unsubscribe from Anthropic because they block third party harness on subscriptions. As long as you keep providers replaceable things will be fine. Google, Facebook, Apple etc were much better deals around 2010 before they became entrenched
15.
by athrowaway3z 13d ago
I dont think that feeling is entirely useful. Because Claude doesn't allow third party harnesses on their subscriptions I doubt the majority of signals you're getting are actually that significant on pure model quality. I suspect
16.
by athrowaway3z 14d ago
The amount they took out of Canada is just a lot less. https://images.cdn.nos.nl/1/4/H/9/t/9/6kexFuRByv6prhDGJSyWt3...
17.
by athrowaway3z 17d ago
From the METR report: > We estimate we spent roughly ~$400K in API credits over the six days of our investigation.
18.
by athrowaway3z 20d ago
Did you just forget about Iran?
19.
by athrowaway3z 23d ago
These are the kind of posts i love. One nit-pick; > The preload table is a list of objects to map last, so their exports win. made it sound like the 'map last' is a consequence of this new perspective, but it’s really still a l
20.
by athrowaway3z 26d ago
I'm not talking about a decade from now and what could happen. We are talking about creating regulation today. Its absurd to believe we're currently at the level of dependency & intelligence that no other defense will be effec
21.
by athrowaway3z 27d ago
As somebody who handles sensitive data, I already signed a contract that says I'll abide by a certain standard to protect it; i'm not up-to-date what happens exactly if I were to build this, but I imagine I could/should be he
22.
by athrowaway3z 27d ago
I don't see them as autonomous and/or hypothetically powerful as you. But I find it much more worrying that you believe internal constraints and training an ethical framework into these models is a valid form of defense against th
23.
by athrowaway3z 27d ago
> The inability to tightly control what to do in the face of conflicting directives I don't understand. We do tightly control it. We can do this perfectly fine. They could have just not given access to the internet. I'm not
24.
by athrowaway3z 27d ago
Obviously to you perhaps. I've not seen anything that scares me, except for human idiocy. Regulation is not magic. In general, all it is is constraining taxable interactions. It does not constraint ventures outside that tax regime. The
25.
by athrowaway3z 27d ago
I'm seeing multiple pieces, including the NYT, calling this behavior cheating and i think its counterproductive. You didn't just "give them access to bash". The final effective prompt contains explicit mentions of using
26.
by athrowaway3z 28d ago
There is no cheating. There is misattributing the difference between the intentions and what the effective prompt actually says. The effective prompt contains both something like: "Dont use the internet" and a "Use these tool
27.
by athrowaway3z 1mo ago
Would this also mean we can get a EuroDollar systems for the Yuan? As in, Deutsche Bank can create loans denominated in Yuan without Chinese central bank control?
28.
by athrowaway3z 1mo ago
It strikes me that historically whenever one extremist side decides to pull the trigger and goes for a cult-of-personality power grab (because this is not a left/right exclusive thing); the really delusional stuff starts when those alr
29.
by athrowaway3z 1mo ago
If only Al Gore warned us about AI as well! /s Thinking these are at their current level relevant to climate change, is a level of ignorance that I'd almost put on a tin-foil hat to discuss how the fossil industry is feeding an an
30.
by athrowaway3z 1mo ago
> Is OSS important because you want to inspect the code, fork it, self-host it, avoid vendor lock-in, or simply because you trust open-source developer tools more? Or, for desktop software like IDEs is open source mostly a nice-to-have r

More ›