asimops

6 ms·

1.
by asimops 1mo ago
This immediately reminded me of Answer in Progress recipe cleaner: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZvC2jtmVAMs
2.
by asimops 2mo ago
The domains that do enforce DMARC are apparently configured so badly that the German secure email provider mailbox.org decided not to honor DMARC. See this thread in German: https://userforum.mailbox.org/topic/10676-mai
3.
Secure email provider mailbox.org does not honor DMARC (German)(userforum.mailbox.org)
4 points by asimops 2mo ago|0 comments
4.
BlueHammer – Windows 0day LPE(github.com)
2 points by asimops 5mo ago|1 comments
5.
by asimops 6mo ago
I know it is late, but for anyone reading this now, as I am: Mailbox.org is completely ignoring DMARC since months... And their handling of the issue IMHO is incompetent at best. See this thread (in German) https://userforum.mail
6.
by asimops 11mo ago
A secure OS is a prerequisite for secure digital services. We can agree on that, right? The task, therefore, is to convince enough politicians to establish an independent unit that can address this issue without direct political influence.
7.
by asimops 11mo ago
Germany requires ID for all SIMs (for "normal" people). You can buy activated SIMs in every bigger city if you know what to look for though.
8.
by asimops 11mo ago
In my opinion, the only solution while keeping Google and Apple as the developing entities is regulation. Despite that, there are some things that should not be for profit in my opinion. A good OS platform is one such thing.
9.
by asimops 11mo ago
While it is technically feasible, it is not a good idea to try and find a technical solution to a people/organisation problem. Do not accept the premise of assholes. I hope we can get the EU to fund a truly open Android Fork. Maybe und
10.
Interest Survey: Copilot for Exchange Server (On-Premises)(techcommunity.microsoft.com)
1 points by asimops 11mo ago|0 comments
11.
by asimops 1y ago
The time to fight against this was when they pushed the first kind of this extortion services. But do not accept it as a given now. The next best time to fight agains this is always now! Do not buys cars that are sold that way. If you have
12.
Linux is about to lose a feature – over a personality clash(theregister.com)
11 points by asimops 1y ago|5 comments
13.
by asimops 1y ago
There is a blog post that captures this feelings very well in my opinion: Not being federated and E2E as an advantage https://blog.koehntopp.info/2025/06/17/no-federation-no-e2e....
14.
by asimops 1y ago
Yes, that captures my intent :) Sadly, I cannot edit the post anymore.
15.
by asimops 1y ago
Wow, that exploded over night :D It's nice to see, I am not alone. With Android working on including a "desktop mode" where you can add a screen and HID devices, I sure hope that the phone screens will get smaller again.
16.
I want an iPhone Mini-sized Android phone (2022)(smallandroidphone.com)
457 points by asimops 1y ago|684 comments
17.
by asimops 1y ago
Might be one of those weirdos using an ad blocker ;)
18.
by asimops 1y ago
I don't think the issue really stems from putty.org being there. It stems from a "trusted" third-party, the search engine, suggesting you the wrong place. Therefore I think you are missing the point with your analogy.
19.
by asimops 1y ago
Well, classic sender receiver mismatch I guess :D Is my intent more clear with that second try to explain? If not, I'm more then welcome to talk about a better way to phrase it :)
20.
by asimops 1y ago
IMHO neither of the two showed exactly nice behavior. But I don't think that this is particularly relevant.
21.
by asimops 1y ago
This is definitely something that should be raised to the putty team. But with how the rest of the text is worded, I doubt that will change their mind.
22.
by asimops 1y ago
As is https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/ to Putty. Still there were multiple requests to the Keepass project to change that domain to "a proper" domain like keepass.com
23.
by asimops 1y ago
I don't get it. The putty website has always been https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/ This has never changed. Just because someone likes to use short circuit routing in their head doesn't
24.
by asimops 1y ago
What does 5G have to do with coverage? LTE 800mhz can give you the same coverage as 5G 700mhz
25.
by asimops 1y ago
I have seen [1] a long time ago. But AFAIK until this day, the Workstation installer still asks whether you are either a private user or have a license key... So is it really free?
26.
Not being federated and E2E as an advantage(blog.koehntopp.info)
22 points by asimops 1y ago|2 comments
27.
by asimops 1y ago
In the case of Attack scenario 2, I do not get why in a secure design you would ever forward the client originating data to the auth service. This is more of a broken best practise then a footgun to me. The logic should be "Parse, don&
28.
by asimops 1y ago
The key in question is the acme account key though, correct?
29.
by asimops 1y ago
Don't you think you are falling for classic whataboutism here? Just because ASN.1 and friends are exceptionally bad, it does not mean that Json Web * cannot be bad also.
30.
by asimops 1y ago
Do they have to be journalists to look into something that is affecting the trust of their viewers? Just like Gamers Nexus explained in their video, you can not trust the coverage of whatever Nvidia is pushing this way. You furthermore can

More ›