asibahi

6 ms·

1.
by asibahi 2mo ago
This publisher copy is neither pedantic nor wordy. It is just a market blurb for the book. The thing that frustrates me the most about AI is how every thread in every forum spend half the time arguing whether an article is AI or not, as if
2.
by asibahi 2mo ago
Plenty of alternatives to Glyphs. FontForge and Robofont both come to mind.
3.
by asibahi 2mo ago
This text doesn’t seem AI generated to me.
4.
by asibahi 2mo ago
I read the article and I still dont understand what a blind reading test is.
5.
by asibahi 2mo ago
The Zig compiler compiles lazily and does not detect dead code. (Read: functions that are not called from any compiled functions)
6.
by asibahi 2mo ago
I don’t understand this comment. Are you implying omitting the chicken is some sort of conspiracy?
7.
by asibahi 2mo ago
Writing a C Compiler is really good. I enjoyed myself doing it with Rust and Zig.
8.
by asibahi 3mo ago
I like this article. It puts to words something that has been in my mind for a while.
9.
by asibahi 3mo ago
I love this. Any chance of having this be a downloadable application somehow?
10.
by asibahi 3mo ago
> right handed presents some challenges too (my hand will come over letters I've just written and there's a risk of smudging them You’re supposed to place your hand under the line you’re writing. Not to the right of it.
11.
by asibahi 3mo ago
I’d argue that was active aggressive, actually.
12.
by asibahi 3mo ago
Not to get into an argument, but most of the population in the Middle East are Muslim who don't give two shits who killed Jesus because they don't believe he was killed to begin with.
13.
by asibahi 3mo ago
Over the past few days I have been making a spell checking TUI app. I used AI (meaning: free Gemini web interface) to discuss various aspects about the apps and debug compiler errors ang suggest useful rust crates for various problems. Just
14.
by asibahi 3mo ago
This can’t be serious.
15.
by asibahi 4mo ago
It’s hacking when it’s someone you don’t like.
16.
by asibahi 4mo ago
You made me curious. Has anyone invented new ways to ride horses in the age of the automobile?
17.
by asibahi 4mo ago
It’s definitely a great tinkering language but .. eh .. the Zig team and community are extremely opinionated about how to use the language correctly.
18.
by asibahi 4mo ago
I am saying as far as anyone other that the Bytecode Alliance is concerned it is custom API for Bytecode Alliance projects.
19.
by asibahi 4mo ago
The component model is still in phase 1 (standardization is phase 5) and the Bytecode Alliance are its sponsors and the ones pushing it into the ecosystem with wasmtime.
20.
by asibahi 4mo ago
I’m confused. Why not start the conversation in Polish?
21.
by asibahi 4mo ago
Submitting a patch requires talking to other people.
22.
by asibahi 4mo ago
His initials
23.
by asibahi 4mo ago
This was a very interesting read. I wonder if similar techniques can apply to Turkish or Japanese dictionaries?
24.
by asibahi 4mo ago
It works if you use Noto Emoji as the font.
25.
by asibahi 5mo ago
No it is not. If you were introduced to the term via LLMs doesnt mean everyone was.
26.
by asibahi 5mo ago
I do, but where does it say so in the spec?
27.
by asibahi 5mo ago
This is the wat2wasm tool I have been playing with: https://webassembly.github.io/wabt/demo/wat2wasm/ It refuses to accept the following (module (func (export "addTwo") (param i32 i32) (
28.
by asibahi 5mo ago
This `dup` seems entirely useless it actually supports the case for omitting it fron the instruction set.
29.
by asibahi 5mo ago
I am saying that textual wasm uses `a b +` (justl ike binary wasm) and `(+ a b)` is just a nicety. It is explicity sugar for the stack operations, per my reading of the spec.
30.
by asibahi 5mo ago
I dont really disagree with the main premise of the article, which is that WASM is not really a stack language , but this part just gave me pause: > In textual Wasm, for example, they are instead represented in a LISP-like notation – no

More ›