ashtami8

12 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ashtami8 2y ago

   How did this article get past the sugar mafia? That too in nature! Yudkin [1] must be chortling ;) Warren Buffett, have your boys been slacking off? Somebody is gonna get really hurt...bad! [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki&
2. 2.▲
   by ashtami8 2y ago

   In the (is this shape fillable by 1x2 dominoes?) example given by EWD to demonstrate the power of formal reasoning methods, a slight change to the problem statement: For the shape Q, instead of clipping opposite corners of the 8x8 squa
3. 3.▲
   by ashtami8 2y ago

   @dukeyukey, from these '_lot_ of studies', if we remove those that are directly or indirectly funded by the coffee lobby, are we left with the empty set ∅ ?
4. 4.▲
   by ashtami8 2y ago

   @clumsysmurf, nice catch! Could it be possible that the coffee lobby is behind this 'counter'-study?, since a relatively simple inference from the OP has catastrophic consequences for the coffee business: Deep sleep is necessary f
5. 5.▲
   by ashtami8 2y ago

   That person must have never heard of Isaac Newton's First law of motion.
6. 6.▲
   by ashtami8 4y ago

   No, that is why the hedge fund is begging.
7. 7.▲
   by ashtami8 4y ago

   Paraphrasing from the article: ----- a kilogram of gasoline gives you about 13 kWatt-hrs, a kilogram of coal a little less, about 8 kWatt-hrs, a kilogram of lithium ion battery can store only 0.2 kWatt-hrs, and, a kilogram of water at 1 km