asdewqqwer

6 ms·

1.
by asdewqqwer 1mo ago
Hot take, but as long as human dose not need to eat food half of the political problem will be solved.
2.
by asdewqqwer 1mo ago
read a book.
3.
by asdewqqwer 1mo ago
Why is it a reductionism view? A true reductionist will no doubt claim taste won't left as well, at least not as a non-private langauge.
4.
by asdewqqwer 1mo ago
But this is basically reinventing the term "Aesthetics" which is a field that had several centuries of philosophy research about it. Not all of them will agree AI cannot have it. Actually I think it is possible to reconcile Kant&#
5.
by asdewqqwer 2mo ago
I use a mini amd pc with a disk bay. Surprisingly it is cheaper than many nas, and much more configurable (from memory to ssd) and have a much better gpu. The only challenge would be finding a very good cable that stays solidly.
6.
by asdewqqwer 2mo ago
At this stage. No doubt calculus had plenty industrial benefit.
7.
by asdewqqwer 2mo ago
Cheating is only fully unethical under two radical assumption: 1. School is perfect. 2. With a diplomat from a perfect school, the society's employment process is perfect. I don't think either the definition of perfect nor the way
8.
by asdewqqwer 2mo ago
Wake up, it is open. You can tailor it to your whatever kind of ideology. It is not like Anthropic which will force you to suck Dario's propaganda.
9.
by asdewqqwer 2mo ago
The only uniqueness of humanity is intelligence. If there is really AGI, human definitely is more close to it then other animals.
10.
by asdewqqwer 2mo ago
Every site should automatically get its own container. This will break almost all sso when authentication service is at different domain.
11.
by asdewqqwer 2mo ago
Well, maybe because of the two ungrateful college students who dared to write in their essay the following notorious statement: > We expect that advertising funded search engines will be inherently biased towards the advertisers and away
12.
by asdewqqwer 2mo ago
I thought it should always be common knowledge that there is no way for any organization of 100m people to have one single mind.
13.
by asdewqqwer 2mo ago
It is hilarious to see people from arguable the most polarized political systems in the world believing the evil 1.5 billion people across the sea share one single mind, either a saint, or a devil.
14.
by asdewqqwer 2mo ago
SOME human relationships are the most valuable thing we have. Many (if not most) human relationships in many cultures are just trespassing everyone's boundary via peer pressure. Disclaimer: I am from Scandinavian.
15.
by asdewqqwer 2mo ago
And it is somewhat correlated to my point because?
16.
by asdewqqwer 2mo ago
You speak as if middle of (not even statistically divided but carelessly divided) human opinion groups is neutral. There is something called facts, and we are living in a physical world. Unless you also believe the neutral view is earth bei
17.
by asdewqqwer 2mo ago
And here is a reddit meme for you https://i.redd.it/eeoo4y00lkne1.jpeg
18.
by asdewqqwer 2mo ago
Read Second Amendment. Also, governments consists of a large amount of human each acting for their own benefit. Assuming they can easily collectively united as a single force to use violence to harm all citizen (on the topic of privacy, it
19.
by asdewqqwer 2mo ago
Any one with critical thought should realize government behavior are usually symbolic and does not necessarily try to solve what it claims to (try to) solve on paper.
20.
by asdewqqwer 2mo ago
Given the capability of fable and the shockingly repetitive silly mistakes they made when publishing/updating something, I am starting to wondering whether Anthrophic can afford Fable for everything themselves.
21.
by asdewqqwer 3mo ago
People always conflate this statement. Only government can take "right" from people. Just opposing people don't make them lose their right. Otherwise it is taking away the right to say against what you say.
22.
by asdewqqwer 3mo ago
At 21 century, especially on a topic regarding Europe, I thought we should have long learnt the lesson from how problematic Legal Positivism and naive "freedom" is from Weimarer Republik‘s constitution. In short, freedom should at
23.
by asdewqqwer 3mo ago
Feel like could reference how those CAD script languages do it.
24.
by asdewqqwer 3mo ago
Yet a published peer-reviewed research should be against humanity. I am also curious whether such research can bring knowledge that apple don't know, otherwise even it is impressive, there is a level of sadness in it from my view.
25.
by asdewqqwer 3mo ago
Evidently Fable is so powerful that it already allow Anthropic to break Shannon's theory. >We will require 30-day retention for all traffic on Mythos-class models, on both first- and third-party surfaces. We won’t use this data to t
26.
by asdewqqwer 4mo ago
As if the dishonesty of human who are good at business has not been criticized since business ever exists
27.
by asdewqqwer 4mo ago
So you're trying to convince a community of mostly engineers — using the example of a terribly outdated technology that stays overpriced purely through symbolization because the luxury industry's bubble keeps holding — that flashy
28.
by asdewqqwer 4mo ago
I keep noticing a wrong narrative when it comes to FOSS software. Comparing software to traditional labouring jobs is quite pointless: you designed and built a car for yourself, building a second one for someone else has costs; you cleaned
29.
by asdewqqwer 5mo ago
I think there are plenty of such reply on github. For example the one to AMD AI director's issue.
30.
by asdewqqwer 5mo ago
yet the poc exploit itself take $2000 and one day, I don't know how the math works, maybe there is some extremely clever way to figure out runs that are not worthy to attempt exploit.

More ›