artax77

6 ms·

1.
by artax77 13y ago
one thing i don't get: if i google someone and find their brandyourself.com profile, wouldn't i (if i'm familiar with the service) conclude that they're using it to bury results and search harder?
2.
by artax77 13y ago
i find this fascinating. tell us more about the stuff you got at the thrift store! liketwice.com has a program like the OP is suggesting, but they have a short list of requirements for what they accept. they review the stuff and make you an
3.
by artax77 13y ago
very nice. would have been helpful to me on many occasions when working on distributed teams.
4.
by artax77 13y ago
i've done a fair amount of hiring and working with recruiters...i'd remove it. my main concern would be that multiple post-grad degrees could set off the "overqualified, will want too much money, unfocused" alarms when sifting through dozen
5.
by artax77 13y ago
i do too, just learning little by little. cool project though, interesting points raised by other commenters.
6.
by artax77 13y ago
good idea to help people gauge how well (or not) they're doing salary wise. is there a control to prevent too few minimum participants, which would make it more obvious whose numbers are whose? the interface could be more graphical, less te
7.
by artax77 13y ago
@apawloski, you're right, it is easier said than done, as most things are. the "solutions" section on the above link is particularly helpful with specifics.
8.
by artax77 13y ago
exactly. it really is this simple. increase the number of female applicants and go from there.
9.
by artax77 13y ago
take her to the bookstore and show her books on various topics, find out what she's interested in particular, then take it from there. i wouldn't avoid showing her any book or resource. if she gets it great, if not no harm done.
10.
by artax77 13y ago
hoping an adult will come along and rewrite the copy for what is otherwise a good idea