arpadav

7 ms·

1.
by arpadav 7d ago
No there is not. First element is defacto winner, but you still have to loop through the rest with 1/n chance of being selected to fully give each element a chance of winner selection
2.
by arpadav 3mo ago
So aliens?
3.
by arpadav 4mo ago
this might be an extremely stupid question, but is this just a demo project of https://github.com/ffmpegwasm/ffmpeg.wasm ? or is this bringing forth some other utility that im not seeing?
4.
by arpadav 4mo ago
Location: SLC, Utah (UTC-6) Remote: US Friendly Willing to relocate: No (after 2 years, yes) Languages: Rust, CUDA, C++, Python, MATLAB Misc tech: Linux, JAX, PyTorch, TensorRT, ONNX, Git Resume/CV: https://arpadvoros.com&#x
5.
by arpadav 4mo ago
looks like a cool project, but id say keep working on it since there seems to be some confusion on why someone would want to use this: no benchmarks and overall pretty vibe-codey (which id personally be very hesitant to use in production)
6.
by arpadav 4mo ago
> “is a mess” then cites two examples where you have to write a couple extra args.. better title: “QOL changes i wish UV had”
7.
Lukashenko Says Belarus Is Preparing for War, Plans to "Mobilize Units"(united24media.com)
8 points by arpadav 4mo ago|0 comments
8.
by arpadav 4mo ago
is this even comparable? lol
9.
by arpadav 4mo ago
the main 4 i see are: 1. use-after-free, drop semantics vs manual cudaFree 2. kernel args enforced using `cuda_launch!` whereas CPP void* args is just an array of pointers, validating count only 3. alias mutable writes. e.g. CPP can have mo
10.
by arpadav 4mo ago
i'll have to check this out, thanks!
11.
by arpadav 4mo ago
perhaps not drop-in, but all my workflows with cudarc have always been "i make cuda kernel, i use cudarc for ffi to said kernels, i call via rust" - which for this case is pretty analogous briefly looking at the repo, looks like t
12.
by arpadav 4mo ago
This is amazing.. ive been working with custom CUDA kernels and https://crates.io/crates/cudarc for a long time, and this honestly looks like it could be a near drop-in replacement. im especially curious how build time
13.
It's time to talk about agentic "remote control"(arpadvoros.com)
1 points by arpadav 4mo ago|0 comments
14.
by arpadav 5mo ago
daily driver has been zed ever since they introduced helix more. still super excited to see how far it can go. congrats to them
15.
by arpadav 5mo ago
this looks awesome
16.
by arpadav 6mo ago
i've had my shot at sycamore a number of times. IMO leptos (leptos.dev) has far more fine-grained capabilities, and dioxus (dioxuslabs.com) is overall more hand-holdy but also powerful. comes with tradeoff for speed. wasm still isnt th