areweai

5 ms·

1.
by areweai 4mo ago
That acronym is unacceptable. It's going to impede discussion and cause confusion for a long time if it doesn't die off immediately.
2.
by areweai 4mo ago
https://www.filfre.net/2012/05/the-ibm-pc-part-3/ None actually, because I didn't recall the original amount correctly and I failed to correct for inflation, and Microsoft was already doing pretty well a
3.
by areweai 4mo ago
Well of course. To be a CEO from a poor background, you need to work your ass off making wealthy friends early. That's why going to an elite school is such a lifeline for people from bottom quartile backgrounds. Getting the opportun
4.
by areweai 4mo ago
Because things are the way they are, things will not stay the way they are.
5.
by areweai 4mo ago
In the case of Microsoft, I'm not seeing it. Being born into a 1% household and understanding the asymmetric upside that having the money and the time to speculate is far more significant than the civil and criminal legal violations on
6.
by areweai 4mo ago
Was there something about this specific model and submission that made you feel compelled to write this self-evident observation? Or would you describe your methodology as more like picking a random sentence fragment as an input value then
7.
by areweai 4mo ago
I think people are concerned about the large discrepancy in concrete claims in your previous comment and subsequent empirical information. You may have seen a headline or skimmed an article and missed some details, not a big deal. The overa
8.
by areweai 4mo ago
What I find most concerning about this is the meta-dialogue. At first I was critical of the maintainers for closing this github issue as off topic. Then I realized that the github ui was auto-collapsing a dozen messages in a row that were a