ardz

6 ms·

1.
by ardz 12y ago
Of course you can leak space in every turing complete language even on purpose, but in case of languages with lazy evaluation (like Haskell) you are no longer able to trivially reason about your programs behavior until execution on real dat
2.
by ardz 12y ago
Unit test will not detect everything. You need real data under heavy load for Haskell. This is a _fact_. Most of you here should stop writing BS about Haskell and how it is going to save the world. > I never said that. Your argument was
3.
by ardz 12y ago
Telling that king is naked also sounds like FUD.
4.
by ardz 12y ago
Really? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21097051/kinds-of-bugs-th...
5.
by ardz 12y ago
Another Haskell SPAM. How can anyone seriously code in a language which introduces new kind of bugs which cannot be detected by any test until running in production on real data when it is already too late?
6.
by ardz 13y ago
First rule of privacy: keep private things private. Second rule of privacy: if two people know then everybody knows.
7.
by ardz 13y ago
For a few seconds I thought someone created something better than Rebol/Red.
8.
by ardz 13y ago
Do not wish, make it.
9.
by ardz 13y ago
I'm able to hack fully working UI without restarting my app in minutes while you are still clicking at your first 'button' in XML. Startup time is very slow, but Android nature makes it 'faster' next time, because
10.
by ardz 13y ago
Clojure joke: 'knock knock!' - Who's there? 'minute of silence' 'Knock Knock!' - Who's there!? 'another minute of silence' - Java - Why did you knock twice? - I didn't, but some other s
11.
by ardz 13y ago
First rule of maintanence: readable code. I should be able to read code after short introduction. I remember it took me 1h (after Sussman lecture video) to read Lisp. It is several weeks now since I'm reading Haskell tutorials and docs
12.
by ardz 13y ago
I found it here: http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Example_code Description is rather clear: "To get a feel for what real world Haskell looks like..."
13.
by ardz 13y ago
Haskell's code is not far away from APL. Lots of Haskell code uses single letters instead of descriptive names. This makes it a lot harder to read and forces lengthy documentation: reverse (PS x s l) = unsafeCreate l $ \p -> withFor
14.
by ardz 13y ago
I have no such problems. Think/hack/try first, code later - this is my advice to you. Pen and paper are my debugging tools, not a type system.
15.
by ardz 13y ago
Haskell vs Lisp, development time (h): 10 vs 3 This hard fact says more than thousand committee reviews.
16.
by ardz 13y ago
What a piece of garbage.
17.
by ardz 13y ago
Well, I don't even put my successful commercial projects in my resume to do not encourage competition.
18.
by ardz 13y ago
Yes and no. Yes because of Python 2.x. and yes because it is an imperative language which got stuck in the 1990's. No if you want to write quick and dirty scripts or just learn OO-ish (OO - object oriented) programming language. OO-ish
19.
by ardz 13y ago
Because this IDE is built on top of Haskell ecosystem I have a serious problem to see the bright future of it regardless of its license. I mean: - IDE should have an integrated compiler. - IDE should download only necessary libaries or func
20.
by ardz 13y ago
There are 3 things that will kill a project almost instantly at the beginning: bad design, bad implementation, bad license. I don't know about the first two but GPL is not a good choice.