apwashere

6 ms·

1.
by apwashere 11y ago
> For example, in my entire carrer in this industry, I can honestly say without any exaggeration that I have never met a single person who was obsessed about proving P != NP. Fair point - an example related to inventing new datastructu
2.
by apwashere 12y ago
> So I just see nothing to imply that CoreOS is a good exponent for some idea of "simple, lightweight enterprise platform". I'd say that's completely valid. I was not trying to imply that the combination of CoreOS and
3.
by apwashere 12y ago
> but it will be better than handrolled assembly. Definitely. And I think if we can move more to discussions along the lines of "how do we best abstract/encapsulate/handle the inevitable complexity," rather than &quot
4.
by apwashere 12y ago
sigh . Sorry about that. Did agumonkey's link work for you?
5.
by apwashere 12y ago
> I cant read this whateveritis because the fonts are too gray/white as the background. Sorry about that, antocv. I've spoken to our web team about the colour scheme a few times already. Thanks to agumonkey for the link!
6.
by apwashere 12y ago
> The Docker simplicity is why they've had so much success. That's how it started: as a tool to make using LXC simpler. Do you feel Machine, Swarm and Compose add to or detract from the value proposition of Docker, in that case
7.
by apwashere 12y ago
> I wouldn't be surprised if even Rocket becomes bloated as they realize they cannot design for simplicity when complexity is a requirement. That was pretty much what I was trying to get at with the question of how a "Rocket ec
8.
by apwashere 12y ago
> I didn't see anything in the Rocket proposal that implied they thought the things Docker wants to add aren't needed I was referring mainly to this statement: "We should stop talking about Docker containers, and start tal