antris

7 ms·

1.
by antris 23d ago
> The US's one-China policy is that (continental) China is a single China governed by the PRC. It's silent on Taiwan Oh really? https://2021-2025.state.gov/countries-areas/taiwan/ >The 1979 U.S.
2.
by antris 23d ago
China and Taiwan are considered one country, even according to US https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12503 How do you make one country into one country? It's already one country and is treated as such by e
3.
by antris 9mo ago
I wish you could export these in higher res and 16:9, would make good background images
4.
by antris 1y ago
What's your point? That education only belongs to the "talented"? Talented in what way? What good does it do to society that the "non-talented" are not educated? Also, no source for claim.
5.
by antris 1y ago
>both extremes Oh come on
6.
by antris 1y ago
>How "ugly" a trivial "Hello, World!" does not really matter much and isn't a good indication of anything about the language's ability to handle more than "Hello, World!" Sure, but for beginner pro
7.
by antris 1y ago
> Seriously, why is the migration protocol completely different on the two platforms? Because they don't want to make jumping to the competitor too easy.
8.
by antris 1y ago
Huh? American and European CEOs voluntarily move manufacturing to China, now everything gets made in China. And that's somehow China discriminating western countries?
9.
by antris 1y ago
Well, considering that the US considers some political beliefs and journalism crimes, "don't go there with incriminating devices" implies restrictions on free speech and journalistic freedom. Also, privacy is not only for hid
10.
by antris 1y ago
It has to do with your argument of "if you don't like it, don't go there". Also, you specifically asked "who came for you" so it's direct answer to your question.
11.
by antris 1y ago
US has been "coming for us" for decades. What the US does does not fit neatly into its own borders. Extraordinary rendition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordinary_rendition Coups https://en.wi
12.
by antris 2y ago
Musk has massive ego too, and he's drinking the fascist kool aid, perhaps even more than Trump himself. Massive ego is more susceptible to fascist thinking, not less.
13.
by antris 2y ago
Democratic party and Biden (liberals) when running against republicans (fascists): " Democracy is at stake " https://www.cbsnews.com/news/president-biden-speaks-on-stake... Biden, when Trump arrives at White
14.
by antris 2y ago
RFK Jr. is the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
15.
by antris 2y ago
Hippies were never leftists, they were liberals. And when fascists come knocking, liberals flock to fascism. Also, being anti big pharma isn't the same as believing in conspiracy theories. You can't resist if you don't live i
16.
by antris 2y ago
Well I'm just going by what's been reported in the media. It gives no indication that Jobs was an anti-fascist ready to resist.
17.
by antris 2y ago
Jobs didn't believe in cancer treatment https://www.forbes.com/sites/alicegwalton/2011/10/24/steve-j... I'm pretty sure he'd have fell in line to the fascist insanity just like all ot
18.
by antris 2y ago
> "A pure function which transforms the entire input into the entire output" is obviously the simplest possible architecture for many programs, but people hesitate to use that architecture because of performance concerns. In p
19.
by antris 2y ago
> But on second thought, I think there might be an actual scenario to worry about: Activists hijacking the system to show political messages. Oh, the horror
20.
by antris 2y ago
>total copyright restructuring Yes, please. Hell, throw patents in too while you're at it.
21.
by antris 3y ago
Russia being bad does not make Nato good. Just like Nato being bad does not make Russia good.
22.
by antris 3y ago
US is literally sending weapons to the perpetrators of a genocide. Genocides do not make the world more stable, just the opposite.
23.
by antris 3y ago
> Yeah, we are very close to losing video as a source of truth. I think this way of thinking is distracted. No type of media has ever been a source of truth in itself. Videos have been edited convincingly for a long time, and people ca
24.
by antris 3y ago
Same goes for capitalism currently. If the bar for the economic system is no more genocide, barbarism, hunger, exploitation of the workers or wars then you're aiming for something utopian immediately. Capitalism definitely has not solv
25.
by antris 3y ago
Of course I would call a pirated movie free, because that's what it is. Free isn't a synonym for good or legal.
26.
by antris 3y ago
Ah, found it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source-available_software I see, never heard of that term. Still wish there was a term that encompassed all software that has publically available source code. I thought &quo
27.
by antris 3y ago
I mean, you're not saying that this project is "closed source" either, right? So what is it if not "open source" on the scale between closed and open? "Half-open source"? "Leaked source" only ref
28.
by antris 3y ago
Well that's the difference between "open source" and "free software", no? "Open source", meaning that anyone can see/copy the source code, and "free software" meaning code that is licensed a
29.
by antris 3y ago
The people who want to ban porn also want to extinguish free culture. So I would say this is a feature, not a bug.
30.
by antris 3y ago
Counter-Strike (Counter-Strike: Condition Zero) Counter-Strike: Source Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Counter-Strike 2 It's all pretty confusing.

More ›