anthonylevine

6 ms·

1.
by anthonylevine 3mo ago
Thank you!!! I commented too much on my account and have to use my alt-account, but I appreciate that.
2.
by anthonylevine 3mo ago
I was commenting too much, and thus can't reply with the same account, but I wanted to say I do agree with the fact that while you can't control what happened to you in the past (and maybe even what led you to drugs in the first p
3.
by anthonylevine 5mo ago
> Really? That seems strange, at least to me. Are you purposely misreading the comment? Where did it say that http was the only form of communication (or even the best) between microservices? Where did it imply there weren't other m
4.
by anthonylevine 6mo ago
> Not what happend to Office.com or what you think about their products. I don't understand this point. Are you suggesting that less people being happy with their product and thus less people buying it is not related to the valuatio
5.
by anthonylevine 6mo ago
> Why not just write stuff in native windows controls and save having to run an entire JavaScript runtime for no reason? Idk, and I'm not saying it's not a good question, but it's irrelevant to the comparison in OP's
6.
by anthonylevine 6mo ago
> a ridiculous electric screwdriver So React, the most popular front-end library and used my hundreds of thousands of successful apps, is the ridiculous electric screwdriver? See how weird that sounds and makes it obvious you guys can&#x
7.
by anthonylevine 6mo ago
"I'm on HN and whenever I see React mentioned I'm constitutionally incapable of not saying something dumb"
8.
by anthonylevine 6mo ago
This metaphor is so stupidly bad it's hard to believe you guys even know what React is.
9.
by anthonylevine 8mo ago
Gonna share this with r/reactjs so everyone gets a laugh. Thanks.
10.
by anthonylevine 10mo ago
> that you don’t need templating, compiler, or anything special to write react, “it’s just JS” This is still true. I don't currently use any of those things. And the existance of a compiler does imply you can't write Javascript
11.
by anthonylevine 10mo ago
> It's inefficient because it's stringy data in an SQL database, but I look forward to support tickets because i don't have to "debug". I just read the events, and have the evidence to back up that the customer i
12.
by anthonylevine 10mo ago
No problem and likewise. Conversations like this are great because they constantly make me re-evaluate what I think/say and often times I'll come out of it with a different opinion. > Could be that some of the bad experiences w
13.
by anthonylevine 10mo ago
I think having constantly changing product requirements would certainly make it difficult, but that makes all development more difficult. In fact, I think most complexity I create or encounter is in response to trying to future-proof stuf
14.
by anthonylevine 10mo ago
No you can't. You can blame the endless amount of people that jump in these threads with hot takes about technologies they neither understand or have experience with. How many event sourced systems have you built? If the answer is 0, I
15.
by anthonylevine 10mo ago
> Most all CQRS designs have some read view or projection built off consuming the write side. This is flat out false.
16.
by anthonylevine 10mo ago
I think people lump CQRS, Event Sourcing, and event-driven into this a single concept and then use those words interchangeably.
17.
by anthonylevine 10mo ago
Huh? That's EXACTLY what CQRS. I think you might struggle to understand CQRS.
18.
by anthonylevine 10mo ago
CQRS is simply splitting your read and write models. That's it. It's not complicated or complex.
19.
by anthonylevine 10mo ago
> CQRS sounds good, until you just want to read a value that you know has been written. This is for you and the author apparently: Prating CQRS does not mean you're splitting up databases. CQRS is simply using different models for
20.
by anthonylevine 11mo ago
So well documented is......2 sites? lol
21.
by anthonylevine 11mo ago
lol But what if, and I know this sounds absolutely insane, the person who stole your laptop knows you and isn't a total stranger on the internet? In your security guru mind, would that effect the probability of them guessing right? Or
22.
by anthonylevine 11mo ago
This has to be satire. HAS TO BE. "Hey guys, I'm going to prove that an OS that claims that you don't have to worry about security anymore is actually secure by asking a total stranger to guess my password" lol.
23.
by anthonylevine 11mo ago
What kind of person sees a claim like "No, not all major breakthroughs were done at private companies. Like the internet, for example" and immediately feels the need to tell them private companies are doing stuff? Are you not read
24.
by anthonylevine 11mo ago
>This is not only well documented Please, I'm begging you to share this "well documented" fact that most frontend frameworks barely "handle" on the simplest of sites.
25.
by anthonylevine 11mo ago
Are you really saying you couldn't connect Guillermo's actions with the health of the product he's overseeing?
26.
by anthonylevine 11mo ago
> Separating fully any technology news and political happenstance is impossible. AMEN!!!!
27.
by anthonylevine 11mo ago
If this was an article on linting, I'd agree. But who has become the defacto steward of React over the last 5 years? Vercel. Whose CEO has made a lot of news recently for their political views? Guillermo What front-end framework librar
28.
by anthonylevine 11mo ago
I literally did to the person who asked. lol. >lol. The moment Guillermo posted that picture, the internet was awash with blogs and pieces about how to move away from Vercel (who everyone now sees as the stewards of React). This is actua
29.
by anthonylevine 11mo ago
EXACTLY.
30.
by anthonylevine 11mo ago
lol. The moment Guillermo posted that picture, the internet was awash with blogs and pieces about how to move away from Vercel (who everyone now sees as the stewards of React). This is actually kinda hilarious to have to respond to and expl

More ›