anonymous245

5 ms·

1.
by anonymous245 16y ago
Very poor piece. I didn't get anything more from the article than the headline already has.
2.
by anonymous245 16y ago
For a politician "shielding from public view" is the same as "shielding from consequences". Do you agree? If you still disagree with the quote, then you're saying that people will misbehave regard of consequences.
3.
by anonymous245 16y ago
Link to article: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/10/21/60minutes/main6978...
4.
by anonymous245 16y ago
How well do these startups pay (as a point of reference, RethinkDB offered an absurdly low salary for what amounted to a top-5% developer)? I think the original article might have been talking about the real world. OTOH, the media is very g
5.
by anonymous245 16y ago
Well said. I've read that memory is an integral strength of high performers in fields such as chess and music. And btw, you can extend this casual dismissal of expertise to knowledge of algorithms and data structures too. Would this autho
6.
by anonymous245 16y ago
If you're getting downvoted on HN for criticizing Microsoft, you might want to take a serious second look at those comments. Oh btw, I took a look at them and if anything you're getting off easy.
7.
by anonymous245 16y ago
Thank you for your follow up. Clearly your experience is far outside my world. I've never heard of an outside consultant being brought in to second guess the company's "architect". It seems like you mostly move among bad developers. I don't
8.
by anonymous245 16y ago
False dichotomy ($1B vs zero). Actually, in my experience, developers understand the business quite well. It's the other business functions which doesn't understand development. You WILL drive out (and keep out) good developers if you fai
9.
by anonymous245 16y ago
Which Unix kernel is the analog of this truck? i.e., keeps chugging under extreme CPU/memory/IO/interrupts/multithreading load?
10.
by anonymous245 16y ago
I used to participate using a recognizable name for networking reasons. But I was self-censoring myself too much, since I don't agree with lots of HN's groupthink. So I switched to an anon handle.
11.
by anonymous245 16y ago
No, the experience on the MBP is not so much better as to warrant getting it for development. IMHO, it's worse. My biggest gripes: (1) built-in terminal doesn't do fullscreen, (2) built-in terminal doesn't have easy way to emulate different
12.
by anonymous245 16y ago
Interesting. Can you elaborate with some examples?
13.
by anonymous245 16y ago
I would start thinking this way: how much effort are you putting into serving this small market? If the effort is small, ROI might be worth it.
14.
by anonymous245 16y ago
Interesting. Are you sure taxation ends after 10 years?
15.
by anonymous245 16y ago
Have the "real" economics gurus like Greenspan (snicker) delivered?
16.
by anonymous245 16y ago
I'm not sure I agree with you. But upvoted for not censoring yourself.
17.
by anonymous245 16y ago
Thank you for giving some sane advice, instead of peddling the magical "single source/multiplatform" promise.
18.
by anonymous245 16y ago
It's in Microsoft's interests for there to be a strong alternative C# implementation. This is just so they can reassure their customers against the risk of vendor lock-in (and M$ does need to reassure customers about that risk). For examp
19.
by anonymous245 16y ago
Why do you think Google picked Java in the first place (and not a "really" open language like C++, Javascript, or Python)? To appeal to as many developers as possible on Day 1. Further, Google as a company seems to have drunk the Java Kool-
20.
by anonymous245 16y ago
Somebody please write a blocker for this. Do we need something special, or can we just add some rules to AdBlock Plus to work around these antisocials? Good job funding this garbage, PG.
21.
by anonymous245 16y ago
I don't understand the hype. I downloaded and installed the Mac binaries, but it couldn't compile the STL headers that Xcode installed. It's FAR from production quality, IMHO.
22.
by anonymous245 16y ago
Thanks, that's a good point.
23.
by anonymous245 16y ago
Interesting. But I don't necessarily agree that all merchants are pissed off. One merchant I bought from had a direct store and an Amazon store. The Amazon store price was higher (by about $1.50 on a $20-ish item), but I still ordered from
24.
by anonymous245 16y ago
Unlikely to work. Companies will just invoke the "false negative better than false positive" heuristic.
25.
by anonymous245 16y ago
Organized crime AND /or labor groups? Really?