anon84873628

6 ms·

1.
by anon84873628 3d ago
Just like would happen with open carrying anywhere?
2.
by anon84873628 4d ago
If by "genetic modification" you mean "random genetic mutation" formally known as stenospermocarpy. Seedless grapes existed in the Mediterranean centuries ago. The now-popular Thompson seedless was brought from the Ottom
3.
by anon84873628 4d ago
Similar hybrids are becoming more popular in the states, for example the "Thomcord" or "Cotton Candy". They're absolutely delicious and have either small seeds or none at all. Recommend to try for anyone who hasn&#x
4.
by anon84873628 4d ago
I've followed it enough to see the argument go in this same circle over and over again. The agents weren't "rogue", they were a neglected experiment by OpenAI who likewise allowed them to keep spinning GPUs without quest
5.
by anon84873628 4d ago
Considering how to deal with people brandishing weapons in a Waymo is not just imagining a scenario, since it has already actually happened. I also grew up in the 90s and did things like throw eggs out of cars. We wouldn't have done it
6.
by anon84873628 4d ago
So don't use it? You seem to want the benefits of the service but without having to comport your behavior accordingly. Other countries already have highway cameras track speed and automatically issue citations. I am happy for Americans
7.
by anon84873628 4d ago
Fortunately the Fourth Amendment has mostly established the answer for us already.
8.
by anon84873628 4d ago
I meant to imply that it's ridiculous because no one is trying to make that happen...
9.
by anon84873628 4d ago
>serious companies will be unable to stop it. Unable or unwilling? All they have to do is stop serving the LLM requests. Or maybe the issue is that these companies are not "serious"...
10.
by anon84873628 4d ago
12 hours later and no replies besides this one...
11.
by anon84873628 4d ago
That's the same as the police getting security footage from any random building. The problem with Flock is that they let police hop on and look at whatever they want whenever they want. Completely different operating modes and intentio
12.
by anon84873628 4d ago
Teen accounts are supposed to be governed by the parent account. I understand the appeal. Parents I've spoken to feel safer putting their kid in a Waymo than and Uber. And I guess the time savings of not driving them around yourself ar
13.
by anon84873628 4d ago
I understand Waymo having this position for now. I also think it is reasonable to push them to refine the rules for the situations you mention.
14.
by anon84873628 4d ago
The number of people expecting drivers to calmly & accurately distinguish between real threats and not is wild.
15.
by anon84873628 4d ago
You can raise that argument when they actually prevent you from owning your own vehicle.
16.
by anon84873628 4d ago
Good thing Waymo yells you you're being monitored then.
17.
by anon84873628 4d ago
>its solution is worse than non-autonomous travel Citation needed. Assaults and abuse against public transit and taxi drivers is a common workplace hazard. Why are we subjecting humans to that? Why are we ok expecting them to decide if a
18.
by anon84873628 4d ago
So? In the real scenario, the underage passengers were drinking alcohol. Also, the 14-17 teen accounts are supposed to be monitored by parents, otherwise all riders need to be adults or their guests. That means they need to exercise judgmen
19.
by anon84873628 4d ago
Are you aware of BART Police or MTA Police? All trains have conductors who monitor passenger behavior and enforce rules/laws.
20.
by anon84873628 4d ago
Well for one, so far they've only called the police on people who chose to use the service. When we have evidence that Waymo is contracting its external cameras out to local governments and allowing abuse, then we can criticize them fo
21.
by anon84873628 4d ago
Would you do any of those things in a regular taxi or subway car? Imagine the alternative headline saying the murderers used Waymo for their drive-by assassination. There is only one option for Waymo here, and the idiocy of the US police is
22.
by anon84873628 4d ago
Well a big reason that we criticize OpenAI for that is because they were the ones giving it access to the massive compute necessary for the LLMs to think. If they had been responsible about their experiments or what types of workloads the
23.
by anon84873628 4d ago
Yeah, I don't get it. Are they imagining this happening just with the open weights models running on however many GPUs the bad actors can cobble together? For now, all the scary hacking things still require an API key to one of the LLM
24.
by anon84873628 7d ago
Which autonomous vehicle company has that as their motto?
25.
by anon84873628 7d ago
A true full-time Google employee is like three layers of outsourcing removed from touching these operations. The people doing the work have been given zero latitude to actually help someone. And then the design and implementation of the pro
26.
by anon84873628 9d ago
We're assuming the oligarchs control the government so they can be rich and powerful and use that to lead lavish lives. Well with these hypothetical AGI imbued robots, they could just construct lavish lives directly. Not much different
27.
by anon84873628 9d ago
At the risk of being incredibly banal, the current US government shows you absolutely can consolidate enough of such psychos. Game theory is a helluva thing.
28.
by anon84873628 9d ago
And even then, reaching "I, Robot" levels is unrealistic. Machines are fragile . It would take a very long time to bootstrap the entire automated robot construction and maintenance supply chain, which would also require energy pr
29.
by anon84873628 10d ago
Scott Alexander article from 2022, "ELK And The Problem Of Truthful AI" https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/elk-and-the-problem-of-trut... It discusses "Eliciting Latent Knowledge" which is "a tec
30.
by anon84873628 10d ago
Turtles all the way down: https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/elk-and-the-problem-of-trut...

More ›