anon721656321

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by anon721656321 11mo ago

   yeah, for a moment I was reading it as being a holomorphic encryption type setup, which I think is the only case where you can say 'provably private'. It's better than nothing, I guess... But if you placed the server at the N
2. 2.▲
   by anon721656321 11mo ago

   at that point, it seems easier to run a slightly worse model locally. (or on a rented server)
3. 3.▲
   by anon721656321 11mo ago

   If a worker could be right 50% of the time and get paid 1 cent to write a 5000 word essay on a random topic, and do it in less than 30 seconds. Then I think managers would be fine hiring that worker for that rate as well.
4. 4.▲
   by anon721656321 11mo ago

   The issue is reliability. would you be willing to guarantee that some automation process will never mess up, and if/when it does, compensate the user with cash. For a compiler, with a given set of test suites, the answer is generally y
5. 5.▲
   by anon721656321 11mo ago

   I think there is a degree of trade off in this, yes a nuclear scientist/engineer/technician in Russia or China is cheaper than in the USA. But also, the people with those kind of skills (or those technically competent enough to do
6. 6.▲
   by anon721656321 11mo ago

   So much for nuclear non-proliferation... One of the best benefits of the current no live nuclear testing treaties / environment, was that the United States was one of a few countries that had done extensive live tests early on. The Uni