anon44

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by anon44 7y ago

   Not surprising in the slightest. I work in machine learning and no longer trust most papers I read. A lot of papers have fabricated or dishonest results, and the people who publish these results are often the ones who get recognition, jobs
2. 2.▲
   by anon44 7y ago

   That is malice.
3. 3.▲
   by anon44 7y ago

   Doesn't have to be a standard IQ test, I would be fine with the test being about algorithms and systems design type questions. Just please remove the biased human component from interviews and use a more standardized metric across a gr
4. 4.▲
   by anon44 7y ago

   But some races were likely separated for longer than that, so these mutations are likely uneven across populations. Very disturbing if true.
5. 5.▲
   by anon44 7y ago

   Well I appreciate these interview loops because at least they are still far more objective than big company promo processes when whoever lies the most and forces others to do their dirty work gets promoted. I do wish the interview process w
6. 6.▲
   by anon44 7y ago

   the vast majority of ML/data scientist positions are actually similar to the hypothetical ML engineer position you described.