anileated

6 ms·

1.
by anileated 3mo ago
Why was this flagged
2.
by anileated 3mo ago
https://xkcd.com/1053/
3.
by anileated 3mo ago
> There is no IP theft because LLM outputs aren't protected, just egregious ToS violations I meant original IP theft that occurs to train LLMs in the first place. But sure that implies that further LLMs based on that LLM are also ta
4.
by anileated 3mo ago
> immediate shutdown all leading LLMs in the US They can license training data. They have trillions, look what they are dumping into it, you seriously think they can't afford to license data. Obviously it would be easier if they do
5.
by anileated 3mo ago
The issues with LLMs go beyond just IP theft. I would not say PRC making LLMs cheaper is the best outcome (though it is better than nothing). The best outcome would be to make the practice of training on our data without consent illegal, wh
6.
by anileated 5mo ago
My theory is that YouTube blocks some accounts for publishing LLM-generated music, and people who wanted to earn ad money from it get burned and publish LLM-generated posts about it. I would be on YouTube's side here, except it's
7.
by anileated 6mo ago
No one is required to use EUDI: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-building-blocks/sites/spaces/EU... Companies and providers (like banks) have to support it, but use is voluntary. Check out the spec and legal fram
8.
by anileated 6mo ago
CEO of Roblox was once asked whether he would ever put prediction markets inside Roblox, he gave a straight face answer: https://youtu.be/XpIXRgMlPo4?t=2122
9.
by anileated 6mo ago
Let's use correct attribution: AI agents don't hack; people hack.
10.
by anileated 7mo ago
> just another thing to memorize Not knowing what time it is for my Australian colleagues at all without checking my phone every single time is worse. Remembering N timezone offsets (remember DST and half-hour offsets, too) is worse. D
11.
by anileated 7mo ago
You have some fun ones. On the other side of the spectrum is PRC, where at the same hour of day it can be complete darkness on one side and almost technically noon on the other. It's super arbitrary with little rhyme or reason.
12.
by anileated 7mo ago
Things you will have in context when traveling: "it's going to be cold", "it's likely to rain", "it's going to be government conference so there will be extra delays with transport", "it&#x2
13.
by anileated 7mo ago
> My point is either way you need to memorize some info in the first couple of interactions and it really doesn't make sense to go through all of this change to just memorize a different thing. It's at least to make time manage
14.
by anileated 7mo ago
You would need to know that person's working hours, so I don't see how you are avoiding something. Sure, if you talk to someone there for the first time, you would need to learn what time is generally day/night. However, you
15.
by anileated 7mo ago
I don't think global time would be a problem like many people suggest. If you're in US and talk to somebody in Australia, you will quickly develop an intuition that time @X is night (or whatever it happens to be) over there, just
16.
by anileated 7mo ago
The implication of "you have to have spent $1000 in tokens per engineer, or you have failed" is that you must fire any engineer who works fine by themselves or with other people and who doesn't require LLM crutch (at least if
17.
by anileated 7mo ago
I was going by this example: > /issue you know that paint bucket in google docs i want that for tldraw so that I can copy styles from one shape and paste it to another, if those styles exist in the other shape. i want to like slurp
18.
by anileated 7mo ago
"Just show me the prompt." If you don't have time, just write the damn issue as you normally would. I don't quite understand why one would waste so much resources and compute to expand some lazily conceived half-sentence
19.
by anileated 8mo ago
Even if you remember the times of iPod, you can safely say you're less than one light year old.
20.
by anileated 8mo ago
> LLMs spitting out GPL code seems perfectly inline with the spirit Only if spitted out code is GPL-licensed, which it isn't.
21.
by anileated 8mo ago
I'm not sure it's always bad intent. People often don't get that "machine learning" is a compound industrial term where "learning" is not literally "learning" just like "machine" is not
22.
by anileated 8mo ago
Here we are talking about derivative works, not "learnings".
23.
by anileated 8mo ago
> It was the golden age of Science Fiction, and let's just say that the stereotype of programmers and hackers being nerds with sci-fi obsession actually had a good basis in reality. At worst you are trying to disparage the entire id
24.
by anileated 8mo ago
> > Actually, you don't have to. You just want to. > Fair. I don't think it's fair. That ideology was unquestionably developed with humans in mind. It happened in the 80s, and back then I don't think anyone ha
25.
by anileated 8mo ago
1. It's decided by courts in US. Courts in US currently are very friendly to big tech. At this point if they deny this and say something that undermines this industry it's going to be a big economic blow, the country is way over-i
26.
by anileated 8mo ago
> unsure what exactly that's relevant to here in our discussion. I'll remind then. Our discussion follows the top statement "It seems open source loses the most from AI". As far as I understand nobody narrowed the con
27.
by anileated 8mo ago
I think LLMs could provide attribution. Either running a second hidden prompt (like, who said this?) or by doing reverse query on the training dataset. Say if they do it with even 98% accuracy it would probably be good enough. Especially f
28.
by anileated 8mo ago
Something can be illegal and it can be technically legal but at the same time pretty damn bad. There is the spirit and the letter of the law. They can never be in perfect agreement because as time goes bad guys tend to find new workarounds.
29.
by anileated 8mo ago
If something is not technically illegal that does not mean it cannot be bad. Like I said, there is a part that should be illegal, and then part where that's used to additionally harm one of the ways that OSS can be sustainable. The s
30.
by anileated 8mo ago
When LLMs are based on stolen work and violate GPL terms, which should be already illegal, it's very much okay to be furious about the fact that they additionally ruin respective business models of open source, thanks to which they are

More ›