anewguy9000

6 ms·

1.
by anewguy9000 2y ago
we could also talk about the technical aspects of the nazi gas chambers, but maybe its only human if first we condemn this for what it is, a war crime. i for one am sick of the normalization of it
2.
by anewguy9000 2y ago
worms
3.
by anewguy9000 2y ago
this. the uis for different apps have different needs - ex. keeping a video editor wide and narrow. and its not uncommon to want more apps open than would fit into their own tiles or having to move to another desktop workspace. i just wish
4.
by anewguy9000 2y ago
do they have the right to employment??
5.
by anewguy9000 2y ago
mozilla used to have this smart guy, brendan something, as their cto. but he was chased out of mozilla and created a new browser called brave. it actually does what this current cto claims to be trying to do
6.
by anewguy9000 2y ago
minimum bid is $199 :(
7.
by anewguy9000 2y ago
got it, thanks. indeed looking again at the whois record, the registrant info is redacted, and the make offer link takes me to domain agents. so i may have jumped to a conclusion here, but ultimately though my question remains: i searched
8.
by anewguy9000 2y ago
this didnt occur to me but its a good idea lol if its automated maybe it could work, i will try and report back!
9.
by anewguy9000 2y ago
maybe i wasnt clear - its listed for sale by name cheap. i am open to other explanations, but im just sharing my experience of what happened. the whois record shows name cheap as the owner. thats the "basis" for my point here. why
10.
by anewguy9000 2y ago
thanks, will dm you. do you explicitly state its a practice you do not engage in anywhere other than the comments here? if so it would greatly help folks like myself if it was an error of some kind. the whois record showed it registered aft
11.
PSA: Don't Use Namecheap
10 points by anewguy9000 2y ago|13 comments
12.
by anewguy9000 4y ago
apoligies for the lack if clarity how does a rainbow table crack "dog" with the salt "109231oijoasdfnaisdfabatteryhorse123"? rainbow tables are as old as time and indeed still work on passwords with poor salting. for mor
13.
by anewguy9000 4y ago
i meant others commonly assume horseloverwhatever is more secure. to be more clear, 1. dog is weak 2. horseloverwhatever is weak 3. 8randoms! is weak 4. therefore, dog is as good as horseloverwhatever or 8randoms! 5. most account compromi
14.
by anewguy9000 4y ago
i agree. but most sites that enforce a policy (8 chars, symbols, etc) are bruted just as easily. we need to take a step, away from passwords, to secure against brute force in 2022
15.
by anewguy9000 4y ago
im sorry, what point are you making? if its that "dog" is a weak password, i thought that was evident. but many people seem confused that "horseloverwhatever" is more secure, similarly that "dog23!Wog" is more
16.
by anewguy9000 4y ago
yep, most of the discussion about passwords completely miss the point. a random word, like "dog" or "pingpong" is fine if the pqsswords are salted and hashed appropriately. how often have your accounts been hacked this w
17.
by anewguy9000 4y ago
second picture in is a dude with a chainsaw
18.
by anewguy9000 4y ago
but this doesnt really explain what makes gpl superior to mit. in my experience, gpl is expensive, and i have seen plenty of fair contribution, ownership, and community making things better with mit. what i was trying to say was that code p
19.
by anewguy9000 4y ago
i would suggest reading the text [0] to educate yourself [0] https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
20.
by anewguy9000 4y ago
so? the gist of the mit license is, "use without restriction". without the license the default is that you have no right to the work, so the license is what makes it a gift. you're welcome
21.
by anewguy9000 4y ago
ive come to think that if you open source your code, u should only use MIT. ie. make it a gift. because once your code is just out there in the open, you cant pretend you still control it. suddenly you're dependent upon lawyers. thats
22.
by anewguy9000 4y ago
its legally dubious but not morally ;) pirated sports are even a better product. they dont have ads. so if i pay for sports on tv, im actually paying to watch ads?? it should be the other way around, and if it were, i would probably sign up
23.
by anewguy9000 5y ago
ontario still conflates anyone hospitalized for anything testing positive for covid, with anyone hospitalized from covid; this alone could explain the discrepancy between a hospital bed and icu. lies damned lies and statistics...
24.
by anewguy9000 5y ago
because 75% of them are probably dead links now ;-) but all the major browsers have sync. you can export them from chrome and import them into brave and btw if you use a lot of bookmarks (i do too) you might love this graphical bookmark man
25.
by anewguy9000 5y ago
coderpad interviews test performance anxiety. there is a set of programmers without performance anxiety and there is a set of programmers with performance anxiety. whats interesting is that the cargo culting of coderpad interviews from goog
26.
by anewguy9000 5y ago
You realize Firefox only exists because it serves Google's interests right? And while Brave might be based on Chromium, it is distinct; in addition to not crippling nativewebrequest as chrome will, it's native adblocker is compati
27.
by anewguy9000 5y ago
on the other hand, while driving with a passenger my android auto wont let them interact with the system without a "safety pause" every 2 seconds, making it virtually impossible to, for example, change the music or update the navi
28.
by anewguy9000 5y ago
note this analysis applies to a datacenter; for regular users, ssds are absolutely more reliable (ever knock an hdd over?)
29.
by anewguy9000 5y ago
lol musk will have colonized mars before this game is out
30.
by anewguy9000 5y ago
i know he settled on emby, but for anyone who uses Plex in a web browser, i created an extension that adds widescreen zoom, random sorting, a dynamic audio compressor, and links to movie trailers. its open source, check it out! https:&#x2F

More ›