andyharl

6 ms·

1.
by andyharl 11y ago
Just dug up these links too. This comment on the Reddit thread may explain why https://www.reddit.com/r/self/comments/2uzas7/i_found_out_th...
2.
by andyharl 12y ago
> Other people’s bodies and other people’s love are not something that can be taken nor even something that can be earned—they can be given freely, by choice, or not. This
3.
Diversity and Dishonesty(nytimes.com)
2 points by andyharl 12y ago|0 comments
4.
by andyharl 13y ago
This is really the problem. Many fonts are poorly hinted and not designed with small sizes on a screen in mind.
5.
by andyharl 13y ago
Pretty sure that he was being constructive. Did you look at the code?
6.
by andyharl 13y ago
"Good artists borrow, great artists steal." ~ Pablo Picasso All these interfaces are pillaging the Bauhaus! Shame on them! Shame Shame Shame! (-; http://www.effectiveui.com/blog/2013/04/26/an-hi
7.
by andyharl 13y ago
I don't think it is cynical. This is a new trendy style. In 3 years, everyone will be complaining about flat design, hipster mustaches, and wishing we had more gradients and glossy reflections. Now i'm being cynical. ;)
8.
by andyharl 14y ago
Justified text is fine in printed material when a certain amount of control can be exercised to make sure that terrible things don't happen. Browsers are horrible at justifying text.
9.
by andyharl 14y ago
I agree that lots of type is set too small. Trying to create global rules for design when clearly something like font size needs to be addressed on a case by case basis depending on what font you are using is not a way to solve the issue.
10.
by andyharl 14y ago
There is nothing anyone is designing that is original.
11.
Apple trademarks architecture, intellectual property gone haywire?(artinfo.com)
2 points by andyharl 14y ago|1 comments
12.
Why Every Company Should Have a Marketing-Focused Webdev Team(moz.com)
2 points by andyharl 14y ago|0 comments