andreigheorghe

5 ms·

1.
by andreigheorghe 3y ago
I think what they mean is that yes, the signalling needs to be done over "traditional" web APIs (websockets, etc), but that's just for discovering/negotiating the p2p connections. The actual data transfer between the pee
2.
by andreigheorghe 3y ago
...who are you arguing with?
3.
by andreigheorghe 4y ago
cool story, now try writing a "Hello World full stack web app" in turbo pascal.
4.
by andreigheorghe 4y ago
maybe it's trained on non-published documentation pages?
5.
by andreigheorghe 4y ago
You do control who you follow on Twitter.
6.
by andreigheorghe 4y ago
are you asking for examples of things that were outlawed?
7.
by andreigheorghe 5y ago
the value the js community gets from `fetch` being a unified standard is far, far greater than the benefit you as a developer would get from not having to add 15 extra LOC around `fetch`, that you'll probably hide behind a `fetchJSON`
8.
by andreigheorghe 5y ago
You're going awfully out of your way to not engage with the arguments you're presented with by other people, dismissing them with sardonic one-liners, and making wild assumptions about the motives and thought processes of the Appl
9.
by andreigheorghe 6y ago
> I would love to have undo! not sure if they added this literally in the last 18 hours, but the usual CMD+Z undo shortcut seems to work for me.
10.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
No, it's a reverse funnel system.
11.
Twitter funding a team to develop an open standard for social media(twitter.com)
728 points by andreigheorghe 7y ago|406 comments
12.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
You're lying and gaslighting. > The Mueller report contains new information about how the Russian government hacked documents and emails from Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee. https:&#x2
13.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
You expect a (good) product manager to be reasonably technically competent so that they can carry a conversation with business/customers without having to go back to engineering every time to ask "Is this possible?". Similarl
14.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
Nice work moving the goalposts :) If, being aware of everything that's happening around us, you still choose to represent reality as "ridiculous conspiracy theorizing", then you're either in a cult, or a dedicated troll,
15.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
> According to a telegram that remained buried until now in the cache of 250,000 diplomatic cables leaked by WikiLeaks in 2010 care to try that argument again, taking into account how time works?
16.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
You just can't stick to the topic, can you? You seem to have specific obsessions that you feel the need to drag into the discussion. Get some fresh air and try behaving like an adult.
17.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
That's a load of rubbish that you've either made up, or swallowed without thinking.
18.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
Nope, the subject is "Twitter controlling the discourse is different than the Russian government controlling the discourse", nothing to do with what you're trying to deflect to. Try to focus on that.
19.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
Changing the subject seems to be a common tactic when you've run out of good faith arguments.
20.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
So then you just created this account to tell us that Facebook banned you for no reason even though you posted nothing? Interesting, why did you do that?
21.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
> stating, without any evidence, that somehow conservatives claiming victimization is par for the course is about as low value as a comment can get > the left wing using their utter domination of prestige media outlets to marginalize
22.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
You keep ignoring the fact that it's a baby account pushing a agenda that's ridiculously off topic. In no way is that the same as someone's biased opinion, no matter how much you try to force that point. Are you seriously not
23.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
One is a fake account pushing misinformation, the other is a real person sharing their succinct, if low signal, opinion. So, not really the same thing. This thread is a dumpster fire for sure, but it's disingenuous of you to try to &qu
24.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
His account is 5 years old and has 887 karma. What are you talking about?
25.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
Did you just create an account to inject some conservative victimization into a story that has absolutely no connection to that?
26.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
> Without these numbers it's hard to support your premise. His premise is that "anybody could learn coding if they tried", whereby "tried" I assumed applies to only the people who passed those two rounds of self-
27.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
You'd be surprised if the largest content delivery platform in the world cares about being accessible to the broadest range of users? https://code.fb.com/ios/under-the-hood-building-accessibilit...
28.
by andreigheorghe 7y ago
I'm curious why this wasn't shipped as a replacement of the existing Number type implementation, instead of this new type and syntax.
29.
by andreigheorghe 8y ago
Why does an open source browser code editor ask for my phone number to sign up?
30.
by andreigheorghe 8y ago
The linked article, and its footnote quoted above, are from 2005.

More ›