andomggazzz662

6 ms·

1.
by andomggazzz662 3y ago
I find the opposite to be the case in all honesty. I've never used C# or dotnet core but I know from word of mouth that it is a relatively well put together framework of tools for doing a lot of the things organizations with a lot of b
2.
by andomggazzz662 3y ago
The difficulty here is at any not tiny company nobody except a select few people at the very top can actually be led by the CEO in the way you are describing, and if they tried to lead the masses so to speak, it usually turns into a cult of
3.
by andomggazzz662 3y ago
Yes that's the implication
4.
by andomggazzz662 3y ago
For the same reason not grinding out the code by hand and copying from your LLM is going to result in you being a less competent programmer in the long run. I really believe there is something to be said for putting yourself through the men
5.
by andomggazzz662 3y ago
That's why they were banned back when I took the tests. Have they loosened the restrictions on the n-spire? The standard back in the early 2010s was still definitely TI-84 being about the most powerful calculator you could use for most
6.
by andomggazzz662 3y ago
Amazon does use mainframes. They aren't a payment processor and don't handle that part of the processing. That's why the likes of VISA get to charge their fee.
7.
by andomggazzz662 3y ago
They also aren't exactly legacy if the performance continues to improve in such a manner that they remain impossibly far ahead of any relevant competition. That's really the part of this whole (tiring and old) conversion that irks
8.
by andomggazzz662 3y ago
Yep that's pretty much it. I have a massive amount of respect for the IBM systems buisness and the people that are a part of it. They are the last surviving computer company, and everyone I've ever met involved in that part of the