amvalo

7 ms·

1.
by amvalo 4y ago
Was disappointed when I realized the author was not an actual doctor.
2.
by amvalo 5y ago
Do you remember what they were called?
3.
by amvalo 5y ago
Wrong how? Skewed R?
4.
by amvalo 5y ago
If he knew they were going to kill him why did he let them visit?
5.
by amvalo 5y ago
> the signs of this type of person are pretty obvious in retrospect What are the signs?
6.
by amvalo 5y ago
Why not just name the paper :)
7.
by amvalo 5y ago
> some other N. American immigration hypotheses (eg, that pleistocene peoples could make boats)]. Why were they so opposed to this? You can't leave us hanging... EDIT: ok and why is this at -1??
8.
by amvalo 6y ago
Fake story -- that's way too fast.
9.
by amvalo 6y ago
Yeah it’s all about the 3rd party who gets insulted. I have one friend whose brother is disabled and he’s told me off for using it, which I get. Transgression is part of the appeal of curse words I agree it’s rude but banning a discord of 5
10.
by amvalo 6y ago
So calling someone R*** is not allowed but calling them shit-for-brains is, though the intended meaning is pretty much the same.
11.
by amvalo 6y ago
> From what I understand, Parler was bankrolled and designed to do exactly what it was ultimately shutdown for. That is, be a concentrated anger-machine-echo-chamber. I'm not angry at the public corporations that have dropped Parler
12.
by amvalo 6y ago
Ok, now I really wanna see a photo.
13.
by amvalo 6y ago
He does have the disclaimer
14.
by amvalo 6y ago
> how much of this nuance is achieved by having discussions about issues which have real life-or-death impacts on people but without having any of those people inconveniently present? Uh, not much? This comment seems to be assuming some
15.
by amvalo 6y ago
The test has actually changed over the years and since people made a stink about the oarsman question, they’ve been more careful to reduce cultural bias (though I’m not convinced it was ever that bad in the first place). It is basically a c
16.
by amvalo 6y ago
What are you saying "No" to? This article says it may have been from the 80s?
17.
by amvalo 6y ago
Talking about the Oarsman-regatta thing? That was 2 decades ago...
18.
by amvalo 6y ago
That and... the war
19.
by amvalo 6y ago
Just because it's not engineered doesn't mean it didn't come from a lab. It could be a natural virus that was collected and escaped. The original SARS escaped no less than 3 times from chinese labs following the outbreak.
20.
by amvalo 6y ago
"Page Last Updated: 03/23/2020" Strange indeed. You said your test kit arrived already? What does it look like?
21.
by amvalo 6y ago
Yeah, and it's not listed... in the actual FDA database.
22.
by amvalo 6y ago
Until recently there were sites selling contact lenses (like visiondirect.co.uk) that would flaunt this rule, but visiondirect was recently being investigated for it so YMMV.
23.
by amvalo 6y ago
Yeah, after digging into it more I saw that. Doesn't explain the missing FDA number though which is quite sketchy.
24.
by amvalo 6y ago
Seems to be a scam. If you look up their FDA registration number nothing shows up.
25.
by amvalo 7y ago
The biggest pain point with the theory was its handling of equality, which HoTT fixes. Ergonomically.. well it's hard to describe TBH, the easiest way to see is to just download one of these systems and try using them. You try to prove
26.
by amvalo 7y ago
The answer is simple: these systems aren't mature enough to formalize the modern fashionable math. They need better ergonomics and perhaps better underlying theory before we attempt that.
27.
by amvalo 7y ago
being very expensive
28.
by amvalo 7y ago
Oof, madison is pretty "hot" these days.
29.
by amvalo 7y ago
I assume the explore-every-corner-of-the-map thing he was doing made it hard to make money
30.
by amvalo 7y ago
> Most Americans can't even afford a $500 surprise bill[0]. EVE costs money wikipedia doesn't?

More ›