amorgner

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by amorgner 12y ago

   It is open source, and we changed the frontpage to make it more clear. Regarding structr.org/structr.com, I agree. We will make structr.com the commercial site in the future while turning structr.org into a site for the community. And
2. 2.▲
   by amorgner 12y ago

   Thank you! :-)
3. 3.▲
   by amorgner 12y ago

   The screencast is based on a talk I gave at NoSQL matters in Cologne this year. I know we need to add better videos, but we're just hackers. Will do our best.
4. 4.▲
   by amorgner 12y ago

   True, it's hard to find the right category for it, so we call it "Data CMS". For some people, the CMS part might just be a nice add-on and the real value is the embedded graph database and the in-graph data model. Many web ap
5. 5.▲
   by amorgner 13y ago

   Further discussion here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/neo4j/nflUyBsRKyY
6. 6.▲
   15x better Neo4j write throughput on Linux ext4(structr.org)

   4 points by amorgner 13y ago|1 comments