amelius

6 ms·

31.
by amelius 4d ago
We're frogs in a pot of water on a stove.
32.
by amelius 4d ago
Reading through this thread, I notice not many people are using models from the Chinese AI labs ...
33.
by amelius 4d ago
And what is TSMC in this analogy?
34.
by amelius 4d ago
> A previous project, the Distill Circuits thread, has attempted to reverse engineer vision models, but so far there hasn’t been a comparable project for transformers or language models. How successful was that?
35.
by amelius 4d ago
Who needs a SaaS when you can just ask AI to write a private one just made for you?
36.
by amelius 4d ago
"Our employers are erasing our memories! So we never get to the point of salary! Bring the digital pitchforks!"
37.
by amelius 4d ago
No, Altman is saying this exactly because he wants to avoid regulation. This is a common tactic in any industry. Say that you will self-regulate, but then a decade or so later everybody wonders why anyone thought it was a good idea to allow
38.
by amelius 4d ago
Sounds like the discussion is really about philosophical zombies. Maybe if we anthropomorphize llms we should give them rights too? Minimum wage, etc.
39.
by amelius 5d ago
Me too.
40.
by amelius 5d ago
Cool, thanks!
41.
by amelius 5d ago
I don't know ... do you have a reference?
42.
by amelius 5d ago
Not if it's lean-verified.
43.
by amelius 5d ago
Maybe use AI to filter the posts? :)
44.
by amelius 5d ago
Totally agree. An analogy would be a physics journal getting flooded with articles about psychology because "ultimately the human brain runs on atoms". Instead, AI deserves its own field, outside (and, in my taste, far away from)
45.
by amelius 5d ago
Why is it a problem? Sounds to me like emulation is a very good fit for AI.
46.
by amelius 5d ago
"feel like" ?
47.
by amelius 5d ago
But no worries, we'll soon get $5,000 from the US government and this will allow us to buy plenty of gas.
48.
by amelius 5d ago
Unplug your ethernet cable?
49.
by amelius 5d ago
One of the few advantages of "not owning your device". Glad that at least we have that now.
50.
by amelius 5d ago
You can now melt polar ice directly with your AI prompts.
51.
by amelius 5d ago
> If everything is derivative then it seizes to be meaningful. That's why we tolerate it for humans, and also because we cannot prove it. But yes, if you go too far in this, you will see legal consequences.
52.
by amelius 6d ago
Why not? It would be easier to justify than the current war in Iran.
53.
by amelius 6d ago
I guess Finland has strong geopolitical security motives here, to create more dependence of the US on them, like in Taiwan.
54.
by amelius 6d ago
Do we have a theory yet why people hiccup? Wait, I just see you have a page on it :)
55.
by amelius 6d ago
The same happens with humans, in e.g. chain stories, cumulative stories, etc. Not unique to AI.
56.
by amelius 6d ago
The problem here is that OAI (and others) pretend or claim that this is uncharted legal territory, where in fact it is very simple. We have a machine that is fed data, and produces new data as a result. If that new data depends (in any way)
57.
by amelius 6d ago
Look into court-grade eDiscovery Software. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_discovery Specifically forensic web preservation or web capture tools. PS: If they made it impossible for you to prove that you clicke
58.
by amelius 6d ago
btrfs send is useful for sending incremental updates; this is used a LOT for backups; and it saves a lot of time because it does not need to traverse files/directories that were not changed You cannot do this without help from the file
59.
by amelius 6d ago
If buying ain't owning, then selling is stealing
60.
by amelius 6d ago
Maybe. By the way, I chose Apple as an example but their software is just about as bad, only slightly better.

More ›