Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
amber_raza
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
You found the ultimate edge case. The 'Prestige Proxy' (NEJM = Truth) essentially masks that individual's actual track record. While we might be able to detect 'Insular Citation Clusters' mathematically to flag syst
2.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
You just articulated the 'Holy Grail' of automated appraisal. Detecting bias across a career is a massive graph problem compared to checking a single paper. It essentially requires auditing an entire bibliography before synthesis.
3.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
That is a fair distinction. My default right now is Clinical Safety. I prioritize high-grade evidence to prevent harm at the bedside. However, for Research/Discovery, you are absolutely right. Excessive 'Gatekeeping' can slow
4.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
Thanks! I just took a look at MediSearch. It looks really clean. You are definitely right that Live APIs come with their own headaches (mostly latency and rate limits). For now, I chose this path to avoid the infrastructure overhead of main
5.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
100%. The 'Alt-Tab' tax is the biggest barrier to adoption. Starting as a 'second screen' is just step one; deep integration into the workflow is the eventual north star.
6.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
I hear that frustration. The reality is that the 15-minute visit model leaves zero time for 'deep dives', which leads to the friction you described. My hope is that by reducing the time it takes to verify a paper from 20 minutes t
7.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
You hit the nail on the head regarding the 'semantic gap'. Currently, I handle this via Smart Routing. The engine analyzes the intent of your query (e.g. identifying if you’re looking for an RCT, a specific guideline, or drug dosi
8.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
This is a fantastic critique. Spot on. Freshness without appraisal is just an accelerated firehose of noise. 1. The Garbage Filter: Right now, I rely on a strict Hierarchy of Evidence to mitigate this (prioritizing Cochrane/Meta-analys
9.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
That is a fair critique. The frontier models are getting incredible at general reasoning. The gap Evidex fills isn't 'Intelligence'. It is Provenance and Liability. Strict Sourcing: Even advanced models can hallucinate a plau
10.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
Fair point on the Privacy Policy link. That definitely slipped through the cracks in the launch rush. I just pushed a fix to add it to the footer now. Re: the trackers: The SVG is just the icon inside the Clerk login button, but you're
11.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
Haha, ouch. I promise it’s just me—I just spent 20 minutes rewriting that comment because I didn't want to sound like an idiot explaining search to a search engineer. I'll take it as a sign to dial back the formatting next time.
12.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
Thanks, Joel! This is exactly the kind of clinical workflow I built 'Case Mode' for. I will send you an email shortly to get connected. I'd love to get your teams set up with a pilot instance. Appreciate the reach out.
13.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
Whoa. $150M ARR on ads is a wild stat. Thanks for sharing that source. It really validates the thesis that unless the user pays (SaaS), the Pharma companies are the real customers.
14.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
Appreciate the transparency and the insight from a fellow builder. You are spot on that maintaining a fresh, high-quality index at scale is the 'hard problem' (and why tools like OpenEvidence are expensive). However, I found that
15.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
That sounds like a fascinating project. To answer your question: In the biomedical world, the 'Time-Series' equivalent is Patient Telemetry (Continuous Glucose Monitors, ICU Vitals, Wearables). The Question Researchers Ask: '
16.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
Great question. I haven't seen banner ads on OpenEvidence yet, but the 'hidden tax' of free tools is often Publisher Bias. Users have noted that some current tools heavily overweight citations from 'Partner Journals'
17.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
Great questions. 1. Prioritization: I instruct the model to prioritize evidence in this hierarchy: Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews > RCTs > Observational Studies > Case Reports. It explicitly deprioritizes non-human studies
18.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
Thanks for the feedback—this is helpful. 1. Re: Clerk/uBlock: You were spot on. The default Clerk domain often gets flagged by strict blocklists. I just updated the DNS records to serve auth from a first-party subdomain (clerk.getevide
19.
▲
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
Oof, good catch! I must have left the test keys active in the deployment config. Swapping them to production keys right now. Thanks for the heads up!
20.
▲
Show HN: Evidex – AI Clinical Search (RAG over PubMed/OpenAlex and SOAP Notes)
(getevidex.com)
36 points
by
amber_raza
9mo ago
|
41 comments