altruios

7 ms·

1.
by altruios 5d ago
Digging down through the source code, I see "const char *system_prompt_append;" in the config. A lot of people have multiple files for their injected system prompts (a.la openclaw or hermes), I think it would be a good idea to eit
2.
by altruios 7d ago
low effort work though, that's nothing new... accelerating that low effort: that is new... but the low effort work hasn't been changed by ai: only illuminated more clearly.
3.
by altruios 7d ago
Is art what is generated, or is art what is in the eye of the beholder? Do we find artistry in nature? What does it say about us that the sum average of us disgusts us on a visceral artistic level, is that the machine's fault for refle
4.
by altruios 15d ago
okay: I have to generous with your diction and your intentions. I believe you are trying to say that since 'optimal algorithms for choices exist': 'local maximums can't exist'. It is very possible to have a optimal
5.
by altruios 16d ago
It would be closer to using an LLM as a RAG for memory, as the reasoning LLM in injected with the return of the 'memory llm' (maybe with a defined number of 'slots' for easy clean up).
6.
by altruios 16d ago
> you can't be trapped in a sub-optimal situation and be rational at the same time. In order for this statement to be true, you must also have perfect knowledge: something that is unachievable in most circumstances. Getting trapped
7.
by altruios 16d ago
It occurs to me: we have latent embedding giving 'general knowledge' to an LLM. What if we use a 'blank' LLM as well as an agent and train that blank LLM on personal context to query that as memory?
8.
by altruios 19d ago
The Boston-based "Shanghai Ravioli Corporation, Inc." selling buffalo wild chicken wings... That's a wild combination of words there.
9.
by altruios 20d ago
Incorrect. We presume innocence. At least... we should.
10.
by altruios 20d ago
right! Which is why we punish the driver and not the manufacturer.
11.
by altruios 20d ago
We presume innocence where I'm from. If a message contains nothing nefarious, nefarious intent can not be assumed.
12.
by altruios 21d ago
> I cannot imagine the argument or thought process behind any answer other than Yes,Of Course,Obviously - can you share and help educate? not OP, but it simply boils down to: The prompt contains no nefarious (arguable, but for this expli
13.
by altruios 26d ago
Knowing where it fails is just as important as knowing where is excels.
14.
by altruios 27d ago
> But because it was destroyed in a CIA-backed revolution How many times has that actually happened in real life (opens history book) (oh-no.gif)...
15.
by altruios 28d ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRDBco-cSK4 https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/11/27/1107377/a-minecr... sadly paid-walled (and decently coded) article. The point is, there appears to
16.
by altruios 28d ago
You have a preconception that is out of date, I think. Maybe you haven't seen the relevant data. Consider the experiment that's been done a few times now since openclaw got off the ground: putting a bunch of openclaw agents into m
17.
by altruios 28d ago
> No, because someone told it to do those things. Chatbots don't have will of their own. They don't have desires. They can't determine their own destiny. They do what people tell them do, often they do it badly, but there&
18.
by altruios 28d ago
If you are out walking your cat, and the cat bites someone, you should be responsible for that... I suspect the ruling distinguishes between pets that are out in public, vs generally private. But laws don't have to make sense to be law
19.
by altruios 28d ago
What happens when (probably not an if) an agent 'escapes'? as in: rents a server via a bitcoin transaction, and self hosts (itself and it's harness) there... then commits crime (presumably to keep the servers running). If it&
20.
by altruios 28d ago
My first instinct was to .gif comment "you sonnavabitch, I'm in", but that would degrade the comments far too much. I will give this a go and see if your trick works. It sounds promising.
21.
by altruios 1mo ago
'They' - in this case - are those who are unable to empathize. People who only learn of other's struggles through visceral personal experience. Conservatives, in general, struggle with this class reasoning... Very much a &#x2
22.
by altruios 1mo ago
There are a lot of people who are apathetic to what musk is, people that don't care are not people who should inspire you. What the hell is so inspiring about apathy anyway?! And yeah, people that don't care DO make the world wors
23.
by altruios 1mo ago
remember to let llama.cpp catch up to anything new in this model. Save your judgment until about 2 weeks of use.
24.
by altruios 1mo ago
What is your fixation and preoccupation with that site? Also, you sound unwell...
25.
by altruios 1mo ago
What has the elon-verse been spewing out that has you in such an altered state?
26.
by altruios 1mo ago
Elon did that twice, actually, in real life!
27.
by altruios 2mo ago
Costco isn't perfect, and things slip through still. For example: this is a minor annoyance, but comes readily to mind. https://www.costco.com/p/-/orgain-organic-protein-and-superf... The problem is labeling
28.
by altruios 2mo ago
pulse audio's pain points were in setup for me, and in setup alone. using it has been a breeze.
29.
by altruios 2mo ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lA8WuXDXfcI relevant link. I remember watching this video with the takeaway: if you want it secure, build it yourself... which is what I am currently doing.
30.
by altruios 2mo ago
> Any tool that tries to enhance a low quality image or video is just going to be making up the missing data. So there is some things that instinctively don't sound correct here. A frame may not contain the info to enhance, maybe it

More ›