algorithmsRcool

7 ms·

1.
by algorithmsRcool 3mo ago
It is still a thing, just not a very common one since the debugger in VS has become more ergonomic and powerful. But windbg is still the king here, for the most advanced analysis of both managed and unmanaged code and it isn't even clo
2.
Deterministic Implementation of a .NET Runtime(github.com)
3 points by algorithmsRcool 3mo ago|0 comments
3.
Chibil: A C compiler targeting .NET IL(github.com)
45 points by algorithmsRcool 4mo ago|5 comments
4.
by algorithmsRcool 4mo ago
But why not do it right the first time. This is an obvious performance pitfall for people that want to adopt this feature. It is bizarre to me after the last decade has been dedicated to performance improvments.
5.
by algorithmsRcool 4mo ago
Allowing hallucinated content or citations into your work is an act of carelessness and disregard for the time of people that are going to read your paper and it should be policed as such. And flatly, if a person can't be bothered to c
6.
by algorithmsRcool 5mo ago
Not my project, but I feel mention of IronScheme is appropriate. Leppie has been maintaining it for many years now. [0] https://github.com/IronScheme/IronScheme
7.
by algorithmsRcool 5mo ago
I was just about to select Jint for an internal project, this might be fun to try out and see how it performs`
8.
by algorithmsRcool 5mo ago
Why on earth did they decide boxing by default was a sensible design decision... We have been pushing toward higher performance for years and this is a performance pitfall for unions would are often thought of as being lighter weight than i
9.
by algorithmsRcool 5mo ago
Well off the top of my head... Active patterns, computation expressions, structural typing, statically resolved type parameters, explicit inlining, function composition, structural equality, custom operators and much richer generators.
10.
RE#: how we built the fastest regex engine in F#(iev.ee)
6 points by algorithmsRcool 7mo ago|0 comments
11.
by algorithmsRcool 7mo ago
I understand this is an attack, but I find myself mildly concerned that the model is "aware" enough to behave differently in the assumed context of a alignment test. Isn't this an inherent thread of dishonesty?
12.
by algorithmsRcool 8mo ago
No. He is a Microsoft Technical Fellow and still a core contributor to the TypeScript compiler.
13.
by algorithmsRcool 8mo ago
I am very familiar with it! My current project at work is taking an Orleans based payment processing system to production
14.
by algorithmsRcool 8mo ago
I get excited every time I see a paper from Bradish. I've learned so much about high performance software from studying systems that he has worked on. (not to diminish his many co-authors and contributors) Some of his other projects: [
15.
by algorithmsRcool 9mo ago
The Tree of Life is singular to me as a piece of cinema, americana and a meditation on the beauty of life and especially childhood. When I saw it the first time, I was so awestruck by the breathtaking cinematography and the incredible music
16.
by algorithmsRcool 9mo ago
It could be done, but what would be the virtue of it? Most programming languages are not self-hoisted for a reason.
17.
by algorithmsRcool 10mo ago
> Like if you build an Excel formula, the mandatory async/await approach just doesn't work. It's not an asynchronous operation and runs into a UI context where you deadlock if you wait. Last time I did excel interop it was
18.
by algorithmsRcool 11mo ago
My favorite part about the FOGBANK story is that once they figured out how to manufacture it again, the new version of the material was more chemically pure than the old version, but this actually made the material LESS effective, so they h
19.
by algorithmsRcool 1y ago
Isn't Span<T> the exact same concept?
20.
by algorithmsRcool 1y ago
The methodology helps focus the attention of human labelers on the controversial/borderline cases, making them more effective in how they spend thier time.
21.
by algorithmsRcool 1y ago
I'm not sure i understand your comment, .editorconfig works just fine for VB files as well as F#
22.
by algorithmsRcool 1y ago
If you look at Garnet's source code it is very non-idiomatic C#. It goes to extraordinary lengths to avoid the garbage collector. Almost all memory management is done with unmanaged memory and pointers. They also have a very clever int
23.
by algorithmsRcool 1y ago
That doesn't make it ok or less impactful. He's been running MyNoise for years and it sounds like if he had been attacked before, this one was much worse, prompting a blog post about it.
24.
by algorithmsRcool 1y ago
You are correct but although the B52 can technically carry the GBU-57 MOP, but it was only done that way during the initial testing of the weapon. The B2 is the only aircraft the USAF actually uses for that munition in combat scenarios. Als
25.
by algorithmsRcool 1y ago
No real secret sauce, the weapon weighs almost 30,000lbs and most of it is just hardened metal to make it heavy. The warhead is only ~5,300lbs of explosive
26.
by algorithmsRcool 1y ago
The kinetics matter here. The B2 flies much higher than the C-130 which would aid the GBU-57 MOP (almost certainly used here) in it's ability to penetrate to maximum depth. 80% of the 15 ton weight of that bomb is just heavy metal to g
27.
by algorithmsRcool 1y ago
This was not from a browser plugin, this was from my system antivirus
28.
by algorithmsRcool 1y ago
I would be happy to be wrong on this one. But I've gotten two pretty convincing threat notifications when visiting the page from the Sentinel One antivirus platform saying that my msedge process had been compromised by a known exploit.
29.
by algorithmsRcool 1y ago
Did anyone else's antivirus complain about an exploit on this page? ---EDIT--- I'm about 98% sure this blog has a browser hijack embedded in it targeted at windows+MSEDGE browsers that attempted to launch a malicious powershell sc
30.
by algorithmsRcool 1y ago
> It's more design and more thinking upfront, which is something the development community has moved away from in the past ~20 years with the rise of agile development and open source. I agree, but even smaller than thinking in agil

More ›