alexAME

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by alexAME 10y ago

   If I suggest Ruby even OP explicitly said he doesn't want Ruby, how is that different from your answer? > tldr: failing one requirement of many isn't necessarily a reason to not offer an option if it succeeds on many others. Ye
2. 2.▲
   by alexAME 10y ago

   There should be a real difference between good questions and questions which could be solved by having a look at the docs. People are just too lazy, SO became a replacement for many references, docs and trivial things. At the current state,
3. 3.▲
   by alexAME 10y ago

   > Django, like Rails is fantastic for hashing out small-med sized apps, but I've been looking to add another tool to the box. Something statically typed, more performant relative to Python, and with a large ecosystem to draw from to
4. 4.▲
   by alexAME 10y ago

   Well first of all, all the mentioned frameworks are great frameworks, I do like all of time, it always depends what I'm trying to achieve, I decide the framework based on the project/customer and MONEY. What asp.net MVC and Rails
5. 5.▲
   by alexAME 10y ago

   I'll quote the OP for you: > and the static typing of .NET The last time I checked on Clojure everything was quite dynamic, did they change that ?
6. 6.▲
   by alexAME 10y ago

   I'd say go with the Play Framework with either Java or Scala. The views are type checked as well, like in asp.net mvc. In fact, it's inspired by the razor template engine, you won't miss the magical @. There are a ton of temp