al3xnull

5 ms·

1.
by al3xnull 8y ago
This is what I'm going to miss most. Heard the news and went to check the Gmail app only to realize I was going to have to spend much more time in my inbox.
2.
by al3xnull 8y ago
There are possibly plenty of cam websites that would integrate or create a new section for larger increase in audience and money.
3.
by al3xnull 8y ago
Or even on a mac Bootcamp OS such as Windows 8/10?
4.
by al3xnull 8y ago
Which would require the somehow the audio is "intercepted" to analyze that the greeting was said. Two-party consent state include that action. Storage is another thing, no?
5.
by al3xnull 8y ago
Second on the network. My concern is around inter-node traffic and if it's segmented or like their current private networking.
6.
by al3xnull 8y ago
Deleted mine as this is exactly what I was trying to say.
7.
by al3xnull 9y ago
Tried so far and unable to get a connection with a key to go through with no error console to review the issue. =[
8.
by al3xnull 9y ago
Careful, don't want any of those senators to step out of line over there. I hear dissent is treated with lashing and in-party sabotage.
9.
by al3xnull 9y ago
Your statement is true that climate change could cause weather phenonmenon, but the headline reads "Scientists Can Now Blame Individual Natural Disasters on Climate Change". The line he quoted contradicts that headline.
10.
by al3xnull 9y ago
Removal of the credit system won't help either. Assuming no one was able to borrow or ask others to borrow (since it would probably just bring back the current system eventually), the rich would still be rich and the poor would still b
11.
by al3xnull 9y ago
I don't think he was saying it's sole importance was employment. If you had read the sentence in a more critical manner, the purpose of the corporation is to generate value. They can't provide employment to citizens, tax mo
12.
by al3xnull 9y ago
No idea where the feedback loop is for machine learning, but the playlists are off by miles for anything other than popular genres of pop, (alt-)rock, and some others. No Mozart or Beethoven; Couldn't match Arch Enemy on anything heav
13.
by al3xnull 9y ago
Isn't those exact companies and the businesses that will end up paying for it anyway through taxes along with others in the state? This certainly isn't a federal problem. I'm not sure how getting government involved fixes it
14.
by al3xnull 9y ago
I think the fact that both the left and right agree on this is insane and goes to show how little regard either wing has for actual liberty. Although I support Israel, trying to "protect" their country by stop individual actions
15.
by al3xnull 9y ago
Assuming he has a 50/20 but then gets an increase to 100 for Netflix, it would be the ISP he is paying. If he is capped at 50 by his ISP, he isn't going higher to 100 just because he paid Netflix.
16.
by al3xnull 9y ago
I'm still wondering if it's possible to little by little add single-payer. If we could agree for basic 6-month checks at a doctor for preventive heads-up, basic immunizations, a single child delivery, and potentially a few other
17.
by al3xnull 9y ago
This article BADLY needs source references otherwise all it rings of is FUD. I'm sure there is definitely references that can be found, but they are just sorely needed.
18.
by al3xnull 9y ago
Likewise. If you want to do something, why should you not pay for it? Consumers storing electricity and load balancing it between devices in their house. Money in coming up with that technology and selling. In the mean time, you relieve the
19.
by al3xnull 10y ago
I don't know where you are from but in the US you most certainly are allowed to hurl racist slurs at speakers in public. It's up to the rest of the crowd to then shout back and speak truth back to the racist. As long as the racist
20.
by al3xnull 10y ago
I'm in the same boat. To cover my wife and child on top of my employee portion of insurance, I'm at ~$1200 a month. It's more than my car and rent. Going through a long drawn out process of lowering my spending income down ~$
21.
by al3xnull 10y ago
Those kind of bizarro "blatantly obvious" comments always amuse me... Get real. Interpretation of the U.S. Constitution and laws has never been "blatantly obvious". Your viewpoint is yours and your bias is confirming it.
22.
by al3xnull 10y ago
Because it is crazy. We can't trust people in power now but the idea of nations wanting to consolidate power even further to a committee of some number (even 101 or even 1001) to rule the ENTIRE world and economy? Won't solve any
23.
by al3xnull 11y ago
Apologies if this devolves, but I have to comment: Except that many gun control advocates do argue as they do because they don't understand guns and the processes around them. Not so silly.