Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ako
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
ako
3d ago
I’ll agree with your last 3 words: they’re broadly similar systems - systems of deceit and self-deception. They may share the same god, but for 99% they’re different enough that they think they can kill one another and their god will approv
2.
▲
by
ako
3d ago
Exactly, and all Jews think Jesus is a fake. And on top of that all the past gods, Roman, Greek, Inca, Vikings, etc.
3.
▲
by
ako
4d ago
There can be more than one solution.
4.
▲
by
ako
4d ago
You forgot “we can stop climate change”…
5.
▲
by
ako
4d ago
Come on, it’s way more common than that. We’ve invented 3000+ gods and almost as many religions, most of them are incompatible with each other. So, most of these must be incorrect, so a huge amount of self-deception. But as Harari argued in
6.
▲
by
ako
6d ago
There are plenty people that just turn on the radio or Spotify to have some random Muzak in the background.
7.
▲
by
ako
7d ago
No, for that money I can buy an iPhone and an iPad. Just checked, iPhone 17 256gb plus an iPad 13inch 256gb is about 100 euros cheaper than the cheapest iPhone duo.
8.
▲
by
ako
11d ago
Quality of life will be dramatically lower for many because we did not take action
9.
▲
by
ako
22d ago
Why does it matter? It’s like a named operation, and if you want local scope you can create CTEs, which is like an anonymous local operation. So you have both options.
10.
▲
by
ako
23d ago
Writing speed is not really relevant anymore, LLMs do it. Reading is what matters most.
11.
▲
by
ako
23d ago
1. Can be done using views. Creating named views is really not that different than building named functions or methods.
12.
▲
by
ako
23d ago
I thought you were supposed to eat the pudding?
13.
▲
by
ako
26d ago
Flipped classroom method?
14.
▲
by
ako
27d ago
This is not counter collaboration, collaboration can also benefit from the use of AI.
15.
▲
by
ako
27d ago
I see it differently: if you’re not willing to consider how you could be better/faster/more productive with AI, you’re unwilling to adapt to the future, and not flexible enough. You’re going to slow down your employer. Most busine
16.
▲
by
ako
27d ago
As I said the response of AI is very much based on the input and context i give it. It’s not like everyone gets exactly the same answers from AI. Ai is a tool that I control. Also, if the response of AI is sufficient, what is the added valu
17.
▲
by
ako
28d ago
If the response of AI is sufficient, why would i retype it in my own words? Just a waste of time. Most of what i have AI generate is based on my words and input anyways. I'll often write a draft note, and then have AI generate multiple
18.
▲
by
ako
1mo ago
Why are you so distracted by style? I see it too, it could be improved, it might be improved, but I don’t care as long as it get shit done. And it does, tons of shit gets done. And the communication is usually more informative than how cowo
19.
▲
by
ako
1mo ago
Exactly, the German autobahn is also awesome. /s
20.
▲
by
ako
1mo ago
Kitesurfing is so last decade, this decade is all about wingfoiling and parawinging.
21.
▲
by
ako
1mo ago
Pagerank is just a popularity contest, doesn't say anything about trust. AI probably does a better job determining trustworthyness than pagerank.
22.
▲
by
ako
1mo ago
Maybe, but it's reality. Not too long ago the rule would be "if it doesn't show up in google, it doesn't exist". Today agents+LLMs are better browsers than Chrome/Safari/Firefox/... If a webpage does
23.
▲
by
ako
1mo ago
The best way to read the information on the internet today is via a LLM. Just like you don't process raw data in a data warehouse or datalake by looking at tables, you use a SQL or BI tool, to process all the information on the interne
24.
▲
by
ako
2mo ago
Go value proposition for me, when developing with Claude code: 1) fast compilation times, faster iterations, 2) user friendly to install, one single binary per platform, 3) feels safer than JavaScript/typescript, which have too many np
25.
▲
by
ako
2mo ago
We’re way beyond that, LLMs are used for reasoning - plan, do, check, act. They will define a goal, decide how to get the info needed (run a script for example), and use these new insights to adjust the plan. This is way beyond just retriev
26.
▲
by
ako
2mo ago
Exactly, and a dsl gives you many options and tools to make the llm more reliable: a grammar enables deterministic syntax checker, error messages injecting correct syntax into the context, linting, terse examples in the skills for token opt
27.
▲
by
ako
2mo ago
For open source llms you can give your grammar to the llm to help it decide what valid next tokens it can generate.
28.
▲
by
ako
2mo ago
They don't need to, they can use tools to validate their assumptions.
29.
▲
by
ako
2mo ago
I think the hard part is not the syntax itself but the shift in thinking: instead of procedural state manipulation expressing the desired end result in declarative set based relation algebra. I see developers struggling with breaking down c
30.
▲
by
ako
2mo ago
Time to start using plsql, ADA with first class support for embedded SQL.
More ›