akaru

5 ms·

1.
by akaru 1y ago
[flagged]
2.
by akaru 1y ago
We speak of the Wild West as “lawless”. I assure you there were very much laws against murder and theft then. They just had sporadic enforcement. Much as roads and highways are in many parts of the country. In California I see racing, 100mp
3.
by akaru 2y ago
Bots, or people who think like them.
4.
by akaru 2y ago
OK, glad to do so if given the option. Is this an offer? Are you campaigning?
5.
by akaru 2y ago
Something tells me you can’t believe this nonsense you’re spewing. You’re attributing the greatest economic boom the world has ever seen, not to being the sole winner and survivor of WWII, but because the borders were tightened. You must be
6.
by akaru 2y ago
Yes, we will lose our first amendment rights if people can’t get rich off of telling obvious lies and slander against grieving parents. Look at yourself in the mirror and try again.
7.
by akaru 2y ago
Right, because the definition of “wealthy elite” is making $100k/yr.
8.
by akaru 2y ago
Can you please elaborate? I find myself making up reasons why but I am certainly wrong.
9.
by akaru 2y ago
“Just rely on another government’s strict regulations and illegally create a business around it so you can get a few durable items oh and stop complaining about government regulation.”
10.
by akaru 2y ago
If the neanderthals could have detected it in utero they probably would have done the same.
11.
by akaru 2y ago
[flagged]
12.
by akaru 2y ago
How about we don’t do that? And if it indeed starts getting cold, we regroup?
13.
by akaru 2y ago
Care to elaborate?
14.
by akaru 2y ago
May have gotten the hug of death. Curious to see if this conviction continues with any election fraud. I hear that a lot but sounds like this was a cut and dry hush money case.
15.
by akaru 2y ago
[Insert quote about casting the first stone]
16.
by akaru 2y ago
I get it, and never post that. In this case, due to conflicts of interest, I think it is justified.
17.
by akaru 2y ago
This article is a paid hit-piece. Trumpian language and all: “people are saying—very good people, the best people—that the voice wasn’t copied. It was a perfect call.” It is so obvious that her voice was stolen, and they are paying to try t
18.
by akaru 2y ago
Ask it for an image or for some text. Then cross-check. Many times you can see: it doesn’t make stuff up, it steals and remixes. Same thing here.
19.
by akaru 2y ago
[ croc tears ]
20.
by akaru 2y ago
Pop goes the weasel.
21.
by akaru 2y ago
You seem very sure about this.
22.
by akaru 2y ago
No kidding. I get the sentiment but the argument doesn’t hold water. A scam is a scam. There are big scams and small. There are lies big and small too. We can even call the small ones white lies. But they are still lies.
23.
by akaru 2y ago
Is this the same google that raised money under the motto “don’t do evil”?
24.
by akaru 2y ago
Got any others?
25.
by akaru 2y ago
Care to share a specific example?
26.
by akaru 2y ago
123% of statistics are made up on the spot.
27.
by akaru 2y ago
Strange hill to die on. Lots of people scam by expecting to right their wrongs in the end. Hell even Theranos may have believed with enough scam money they could eventually have made right with the tech. Still a scam. Same here. If it’s not
28.
by akaru 2y ago
Exactly. Why are there so many people trying to talk themselves into a corner?
29.
by akaru 2y ago
What does ffmpeg do that AVFoundation does not?
30.
by akaru 2y ago
Yet a drug—that people willingly and optionally take as opposed to this—must be proven NOT to create harm before it is allowed in the wild. Your argument sounds like it is in bad faith.

More ›