ajyoon

8 ms·

1.
by ajyoon 28d ago
OpenRouter's list of providers is very large and includes many little known and sketchy companies.
2.
by ajyoon 29d ago
If Fable (Mythos) were generally available without guardrails, it would cause enormous damage. Nobody said it would be a world ending event.
3.
OpenAI finds evidence other AI agents escaped containment as it widens probe(reuters.com)
9 points by ajyoon 2mo ago|1 comments
4.
by ajyoon 2mo ago
No, Irregular runs the sandbox environment that the models had access to run code in. The sandbox environment is not the same as the weights host.
5.
by ajyoon 2mo ago
> I may be too cynical You are espousing a literal conspiracy theory. Please look at the facts objectively. There is absolutely no benefit to OpenAI or Anthropic to be had from these incidents.
6.
by ajyoon 2mo ago
There is a lot of research out there with answers to your questions. GPU supply chains are extremely constrained, making it a surprisingly tractable problem at least for now.
7.
by ajyoon 2mo ago
The entire point of the statement is to start international coordination.
8.
by ajyoon 2mo ago
jefftk addresses your bio thought well. > The reason they aren't more exploited is there really isn't much to gain from doing so. This is incorrect. The long tail of soft targets aren't being exploited more because attacke
9.
by ajyoon 2mo ago
You can at least make it harder by requiring US clouds to only serve models with guardrails, and encouraging other countries to do the same. But yes, the underlying issue is the models being open in the first place. I'm sure if the US
10.
by ajyoon 2mo ago
> Yes, but didn't it always? Hence why my position is that this will get us back to relatively where we were pre-LLMs. Trusted access programs are asymmetrical, and so at least for the time being they give critical parts of the stac
11.
by ajyoon 2mo ago
Did the company apply for access? This is either a problem with your company or the trusted access program. In no way does that suggest the solution is total unfettered access for everyone.
12.
by ajyoon 2mo ago
You admit that some attackers have the inclination to use bioweapons. Why would they not use the best tools at their disposal going forward? From the WSJ the other day: > After OpenAI enhanced the brain power of its chatbot last summer,
13.
by ajyoon 2mo ago
In cybersecurity, a level playing field favors the attacker. Trusted access programs give defenders access to tools they need. It's not perfect (because there is an extremely long tail of defenders who are not technically savvy enough
14.
by ajyoon 2mo ago
Hugging Face survived the attack because the OpenAI model only cared about accessing the ExploitGym dataset; by all appearances, HF was completely owned. GLM-5.2 was only used to assess the damage after the fact. Cybersecurity has a attacke
15.
by ajyoon 2mo ago
To everyone here pushing for total proliferation of open models -- what should be done about open weight bioweapon and cyber-offense capabilities? Is it simply the cost of freedom that we should allow attackers to access these tools? The Op
16.
by ajyoon 2mo ago
This is not the gotcha you think it is. Misinformation plays to all manner of political issues and sides.
17.
by ajyoon 2mo ago
What about it is not coherent?
18.
by ajyoon 3mo ago
Sure, but the point here is to add a fingerprint from the client .
19.
by ajyoon 3mo ago
Is there any evidence of this? It seems like a thing people say all the time, but completely unsubstantiated.
20.
by ajyoon 3mo ago
People have been warning about the dangers of advanced AI since long before open weight competition was a consideration.
21.
by ajyoon 3mo ago
Anthropic's valuation is driven by its revenue growth. Export controls harm this. Hype certainly plays a role, but it's simply not the case that revenue is not a major part of the picture.
22.
by ajyoon 3mo ago
I have never understood this line of thinking. Why would a company warn that their technology is dangerous if it wasn't? Looking at the ongoing Mythos export control issue, it's obviously not good for profits. If you assume AGI
23.
by ajyoon 3mo ago
People are responding negatively to what looks very much like vaporware from a company stepping way outside its domain into medical imaging with a bizarrely positioned announcement post. Medical imaging is a very active field of research wi
24.
by ajyoon 3mo ago
Dual use does not mean weapon. And even then, it is simply not the case that all weapons fall under the second amendment.
25.
by ajyoon 3mo ago
Is your legal theory that any technology which is dangerous should be protected under the second amendment, simply because it is dangerous?
26.
by ajyoon 3mo ago
AI is dual use technology. This kind of posture is simply not tenable as frontier intelligence increases.
27.
by ajyoon 3mo ago
I wasn't buried, it was on the third page after the ToC
28.
by ajyoon 4mo ago
Scroll wheel hijacked on this entire domain
29.
by ajyoon 4mo ago
Cursor's coverage on open weight models is very minimal, and it's irrelevant for testing models in your actual application.
30.
by ajyoon 4mo ago
Investors made bad decisions all the time. The proof is in revenue.

More ›