ajoberstar

50 ms·

1.
by ajoberstar 5mo ago
Nice to see some seemingly jujutsu inspired features getting into Git core. git history reword ~= jj describe git history split ~= jj split https://git-scm.com/docs/git-history https://www.jj-vcs.d
2.
by ajoberstar 1y ago
It's not even the same ballpark.
3.
by ajoberstar 1y ago
Definitely. Should have phrased it as "cant's see it's that reasonable a use of time _for most people_".
4.
by ajoberstar 1y ago
I was on my 3rd Synology over the last 12 years or so. They were solid and something I didn't have to pay attention to. But the drive lock-in tipped me over the edge when I needed to expand space. I'm getting burned out with all o
5.
by ajoberstar 1y ago
It doesn't seem like you're talking about the same thing the article is. Graham doesn't say "you must be a good writer to be a good thinker". > This is only true of writing that's used to develop ideas, thou
6.
by ajoberstar 2y ago
Nest thermostats have a heat and cool mode where you have setpoints for each. On older ones there was a limit on how close the two could be set.
7.
by ajoberstar 2y ago
> The problem stems from the fact that Unicode encodes characters rather than "glyphs," which are the visual representations of the characters. There are four basic traditions for East Asian character shapes: traditional Chines
8.
by ajoberstar 2y ago
That's not what happened. Downstream was building from source, that source just had malicious code in it. One part was binary, the test file (pretty common), but checked into the repo. One part was in the build config/script, but
9.
by ajoberstar 3y ago
Git would make you merge or rebase, but yes there wouldn't be a conflict. They're saying Pijul would let you directly push without having to deal with the diverging histories.
10.
by ajoberstar 3y ago
As with other versions of Datomic, this is not open source (only binaries are Apache licensed). EDIT: Rephrased to sound less snarky. Not inherently a bad thing, but it's a limiting factor for many, including myself. EDIT 2: Typo
11.
by ajoberstar 3y ago
In the replies they link to this blog post with the details. Using the UBI images and public cloud instances does seem like a clever way to handle that. https://rockylinux.org/news/keeping-open-source-open/
12.
by ajoberstar 3y ago
VS Code brought Language Server Protocol, so I don't think the "vision" balance is as one-sided as you imply.
13.
by ajoberstar 4y ago
I believe it's because it's from The World Ahead issue, which iirc always has bylines unlike the normal weekly paper.
14.
by ajoberstar 4y ago
Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see that called out anywhere. I don't believe that's true anymore, but correct me if I'm wrong. For reference I double checked here: https://www.oracle.com/java/tech
15.
by ajoberstar 4y ago
I personally haven't had a reason to use Oracle's because I like having the latest version and any actively maintained LTS versions available for development and would prefer to use one vendor for all of them. Eclipse Temurin and
16.
by ajoberstar 4y ago
You can get a paid commercial support license for Oracle's JDK to get an extended maintenance window. But Oracle's publicly available builds don't require a paid license. However,they only provide public builds of the curre
17.
by ajoberstar 4y ago
Oracle's builds of Java are open source as well. The OpenJDK codebase is shared across all of the vendors that provide builds.